December 4, 2011 at 6:28 am
Hi,
Wonder to know the limitations of partitioned table if any exists. Could anyone help me?
Have fun,
Parissa
December 4, 2011 at 8:57 am
Do you mean aside from the fact that it requires the Enterprise version of SQL Server?
December 4, 2011 at 9:36 am
What do you consider as "limitations"?
Would the fact count, that a query with a WHERE clause that covers more than one partition might run significantly slower than against a properly indexed, but unpartitioned table?
December 4, 2011 at 10:01 am
jonangela571 (12/4/2011)
Hello all my friend. I am new member
Spam. Reported. No replies please.
December 5, 2011 at 12:58 am
LutzM (12/4/2011)
What do you consider as "limitations"?Would the fact count, that a query with a WHERE clause that covers more than one partition might run significantly slower than against a properly indexed, but unpartitioned table?
Also,
Partitions per partitioned table or index: 1,000
Per: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms143432.aspx
(I remember one article which indicates it can go upto 15K partitions per table but not able to find that one.)
December 7, 2011 at 1:48 am
Dev (12/5/2011)
LutzM (12/4/2011)
What do you consider as "limitations"?Would the fact count, that a query with a WHERE clause that covers more than one partition might run significantly slower than against a properly indexed, but unpartitioned table?
Also,
Partitions per partitioned table or index: 1,000
Per: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms143432.aspx
(I remember one article which indicates it can go upto 15K partitions per table but not able to find that one.)
Yeap, I meant things like this. Like mirroring, it's not good for more that 22 databases, or "linked servers" which have problems with XML, I want to know the limitations before making decisions about choosing it in enterprise level.
Things like what you said about slower WHERE clause, is of high importance to me.
Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply