January 24, 2011 at 9:22 pm
Comments posted to this topic are about the item sys.objects
M&M
January 25, 2011 at 1:03 am
:w00t:
January 25, 2011 at 2:53 am
Nice and easy, thanks.
Need an answer? No, you need a question
My blog at https://sqlkover.com.
MCSE Business Intelligence - Microsoft Data Platform MVP
January 25, 2011 at 3:02 am
An easy question and I cannot believe I missed it. I answered too quickly without thinking about the other possibilities.
January 25, 2011 at 3:11 am
Thanks for the easy point today.
January 25, 2011 at 7:13 am
Nice question. Obviously several people might learn something since "System base table" answer was almost as popular as the correct answer. 😎
January 25, 2011 at 7:22 am
Nice and easy start for the day..
January 25, 2011 at 7:26 am
SanDroid (1/25/2011)
Nice question. Obviously several people might learn something since "System base table" answer was almost as popular as the correct answer. 😎
Yup, that's the one I selected and as soon as I submitted my answer, I had a feeling it was going to be wrong.
January 25, 2011 at 7:54 am
cengland0 (1/25/2011)
SanDroid (1/25/2011)
Nice question. Obviously several people might learn something since "System base table" answer was almost as popular as the correct answer. 😎Yup, that's the one I selected and as soon as I submitted my answer, I had a feeling it was going to be wrong.
Here is a quick of the history of sysobjects or sys.objects on the differant server versions.
SQL 2000 - dbo.sysobjects was a System table. Contains one row for each object (constraint, default, log, rule, stored procedure, and so on) created within a database. In tempdb only, this table includes a row for each temporary object. Some did call it the base system table since it was the first object listed.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa260447(SQL.80).aspx
SQL 2005 - sys.objects system view was created as part of the object catalog. dbo.sysobjects and sys.sysobjects are made as compatibility views. M$ recomends switching over from one to the other.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms177596(v=SQL.90).aspx
SQL 2008 - Nothing changes but the server version.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms177596(v=SQL.105).aspx
It is important to mention that not only do sysobjects and sys.objects have a differant name, they have a differant schema also. The column names are differant, along with some other things.
😎
January 25, 2011 at 8:41 am
Thank you 🙂
M&M
January 25, 2011 at 9:56 am
Thanks for the question.
Jason...AKA CirqueDeSQLeil
_______________________________________________
I have given a name to my pain...MCM SQL Server, MVP
SQL RNNR
Posting Performance Based Questions - Gail Shaw[/url]
Learn Extended Events
January 25, 2011 at 10:02 am
Thanks for an easy start to the day!
January 25, 2011 at 10:52 am
I found SanDroid's history lesson very helpful. Thanks for adding it to the discussion.
January 26, 2011 at 2:17 pm
Nice easy question.
But why have more than half the people who answered got it wrong? It is a straightforwards and easy one, isn't it? There's not something weird that's leading half the people to give wrong answers?
Tom
February 1, 2011 at 3:49 am
Nice & Easy 😀
Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 15 total)
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply