Syntax Validation

Question

Post reply

Syntax Validation

shanjan.sapra

Mr or Mrs. 500

Points: 555
More actions
April 5, 2014 at 3:10 pm

#306315

Comments posted to this topic are about the item Syntax Validation
April 6, 2014 at 5:44 pm

This was removed by the editor as SPAM

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 34 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply

Yogeshwar Phull Default port Points: 1434 More actions · Answer 1

Yogeshwar Phull

Default port

Points: 1434

April 6, 2014 at 8:34 pm

#1703621

Nice question Shanjan. Thanks. +1

Ford Fairlane SSCertifiable Points: 7664 More actions · Answer 2

Easy one.[/url]

Hope this helps...

Ford Fairlane
Rock and Roll Detective

free_mascot One Orange Chip Points: 27169 More actions · Answer 3

Easy One! thanks.

---------------------------------------------------
"Thare are only 10 types of people in the world:
Those who understand binary, and those who don't."

TjhomasH6610 SSCommitted Points: 1690 More actions · Answer 4

TjhomasH6610

SSCommitted

Points: 1690

April 7, 2014 at 12:09 am

#1703650

Easy one. Thanks

[/url]

Koen Verbeeck SSC Guru Points: 259115 More actions · Answer 5

Interesting question, thanks.

Need an answer? No, you need a question
My blog at https://sqlkover.com.
MCSE Business Intelligence - Microsoft Data Platform MVP

happycat59 One Orange Chip Points: 29389 More actions · Answer 6

SET NOEXEC might find syntax errors but it doesn't find all errors. I copied a piece of code that included a "RANK... PARTITION BY [invalid column]" - I changed everything except the column I was partitioning by (which was actually a mistake on my part). "SET NOEXEC ON" is happy with this but when you actually execute the code, it will fail.

So, as far as I am concerned, the only way to actually check the syntax of your code is to run it in a development environment which is how I answered this question.

Carlo Romagnano SSC-Insane Points: 22682 More actions · Answer 7

happycat59 (4/7/2014)
SET NOEXEC might find syntax errors but it doesn't find all errors. I copied a piece of code that included a "RANK... PARTITION BY [invalid column]" - I changed everything except the column I was partitioning by (which was actually a mistake on my part). "SET NOEXEC ON" is happy with this but when you actually execute the code, it will fail.
So, as far as I am concerned, the only way to actually check the syntax of your code is to run it in a development environment which is how I answered this question.

I get it right, but I agree with you "run it in a development environment".

I think that the right answers are both "run it in a development environment" and "SET NOEXEC ON" (fifty/fifty).

😀

kupy SSCommitted Points: 1652 More actions · Answer 8

Carlo Romagnano (4/7/2014)
happycat59 (4/7/2014)
SET NOEXEC might find syntax errors but it doesn't find all errors. I copied a piece of code that included a "RANK... PARTITION BY [invalid column]" - I changed everything except the column I was partitioning by (which was actually a mistake on my part). "SET NOEXEC ON" is happy with this but when you actually execute the code, it will fail.
So, as far as I am concerned, the only way to actually check the syntax of your code is to run it in a development environment which is how I answered this question.
I get it right, but I agree with you "run it in a development environment".
I think that the right answers are both "run it in a development environment" and "SET NOEXEC ON" (fifty/fifty).
😀

Dev can be different from prod, just because it's dev.

Richard Warr SSCertifiable Points: 6967 More actions · Answer 9

Despite popular opinion (see above) there's no "easy" answer to this. NOEXEC is good but it won't find everything and there is the risk that you might miss one somewhere.

I prefer the "test as much as you can" approach. If Dev is vastly different from Prod then that's an issue which should be addressed.

Carlo Romagnano SSC-Insane Points: 22682 More actions · Answer 10

kupy (4/7/2014)
Carlo Romagnano (4/7/2014)
happycat59 (4/7/2014)
SET NOEXEC might find syntax errors but it doesn't find all errors. I copied a piece of code that included a "RANK... PARTITION BY [invalid column]" - I changed everything except the column I was partitioning by (which was actually a mistake on my part). "SET NOEXEC ON" is happy with this but when you actually execute the code, it will fail.
So, as far as I am concerned, the only way to actually check the syntax of your code is to run it in a development environment which is how I answered this question.
I get it right, but I agree with you "run it in a development environment".
I think that the right answers are both "run it in a development environment" and "SET NOEXEC ON" (fifty/fifty).
😀
Dev can be different from prod, just because it's dev.

Sorry, I want to say "run it in a TEST environment".

Nakul Vachhrajani SSChampion Points: 10294 More actions · Answer 11

The surest way of validating the syntax is always running it on a test server. NOEXEC and other alternatives will not be able to catch all syntax exceptions.

Thanks & Regards,
Nakul Vachhrajani.
http://nakulvachhrajani.com

Follow me on
Twitter: @sqltwins

Arthur Olcot SSCertifiable Points: 6666 More actions · Answer 12

Richard Warr (4/7/2014)
Despite popular opinion (see above) there's no "easy" answer to this. NOEXEC is good but it won't find everything and there is the risk that you might miss one somewhere.
I prefer the "test as much as you can" approach. If Dev is vastly different from Prod then that's an issue which should be addressed.

Agreed.. this was my thinking and hence why I got it wrong.

Andrew Watson-478275 SSCarpal Tunnel Points: 4652 More actions · Answer 13

Can someone explain how adding a NOEXEC statement and then having to remember to remove it again afterwards is "easier" than just pressing Ctrl-F5 in SSMS?

In a question like this "None of the above" covers a lot of ground.