February 15, 2010 at 10:33 am
Ahhh.... that might explain what looked like a contradiction. Maybe it is the GUI that accepts blank/zero but the XML underneath is always zero. That would make sense. Thanks!
Chad
February 15, 2010 at 10:37 am
Chad Crawford (2/15/2010)
Ahhh.... that might explain what looked like a contradiction. Maybe it is the GUI that accepts blank/zero but the XML underneath is always zero. That would make sense. Thanks!Chad
Then at the very least, there should have been two possible correct answers. Either of the two answers blank or 0 should have been viable.
(just spurning on the debate)
Jason...AKA CirqueDeSQLeil
_______________________________________________
I have given a name to my pain...MCM SQL Server, MVP
SQL RNNR
Posting Performance Based Questions - Gail Shaw[/url]
Learn Extended Events
February 15, 2010 at 2:06 pm
What a fluke. I got right. I thought it should be 0 but SSC would not post a simple question with 2 points. Apart from 0 only leave it blank looked a logical answer. What ever.
Discussion was good than the question.
SQL DBA.
February 15, 2010 at 4:58 pm
I find it interesting that the question has only been answered correctly 10% of the time. And 70% of the people missing the question all missed it selecting the same answer.
Thanks for the question at any rate. I will go back to the darkness now 😛
Jason...AKA CirqueDeSQLeil
_______________________________________________
I have given a name to my pain...MCM SQL Server, MVP
SQL RNNR
Posting Performance Based Questions - Gail Shaw[/url]
Learn Extended Events
February 15, 2010 at 6:14 pm
Jason
And Steve was off today on a ski trip ... but he did manage to add to the question "SQL Server 2000". but said nothing about awarding points to thos who answered correctly, but incorrectly to the original question.
Shall I cry
I want my point awarded
as I said before "Oh well"
February 15, 2010 at 11:36 pm
bitbucket-25253 (2/15/2010)
JasonAnd Steve was off today on a ski trip ... but he did manage to add to the question "SQL Server 2000". but said nothing about awarding points to thos who answered correctly, but incorrectly to the original question.
Shall I cry
I want my point awarded
as I said before "Oh well"
You lured me back - I couldn't resist the earlier comment. I already got the equivalent points by posting multiple times to this thread. As you have done as well :hehe::hehe:
Jason...AKA CirqueDeSQLeil
_______________________________________________
I have given a name to my pain...MCM SQL Server, MVP
SQL RNNR
Posting Performance Based Questions - Gail Shaw[/url]
Learn Extended Events
February 16, 2010 at 7:09 am
CirquedeSQLeil (2/15/2010)
You lured me back - I couldn't resist the earlier comment. I already got the equivalent points by posting multiple times to this thread. As you have done as well :hehe::hehe:
Well, in which case, I claim my second point too.... 😉
February 18, 2010 at 10:02 am
Steve Jones - Editor (2/15/2010)
The question has had the version added.
But it still says SSRS, which surely is the name used from SQLS 2005 onwards, not the one used in SQLS 2000?
Tom
March 15, 2010 at 2:41 pm
I should have known to avoid a question with version mixing , i.e. SSRS SQL Server 2000 😀
Got me! I chose 0 like everyone else using SSRS (2005 or 2008) because left blank or set to zero, it is always set to zero "under the hood"...
I shall watch more closely next time...
Peter Trast
Microsoft Certified ...(insert many literal strings here)
Microsoft Design Architect with Alexander Open Systems
March 30, 2010 at 8:45 am
Tedious question. Just the sort of pointless detail I do not need in my head.
Paul White
SQLPerformance.com
SQLkiwi blog
@SQL_Kiwi
March 22, 2014 at 5:05 am
I've tried to put to gather possible timeout configuration here, refer below links
http://www.avyuktasolutions.com/blog/sql-server-reporting-services-timeout-settings/
Feel free to add If I missed anything.
Alpesh Dhori | Software Professional
Viewing 11 posts - 16 through 25 (of 25 total)
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply