November 4, 2013 at 8:49 pm
😀 Easy question - no wait after looking deeper into this shouldn't I expect to see oh wait no it was easy thanks Steve for the QotD
Hope this helps...
Ford Fairlane
Rock and Roll Detective
November 5, 2013 at 4:46 am
Easy one, thanks!
Need an answer? No, you need a question
My blog at https://sqlkover.com.
MCSE Business Intelligence - Microsoft Data Platform MVP
November 5, 2013 at 6:15 am
I have decided to post this instead of the usual, "nice question" comments...
This might not be correctly on topic but I have noticed something (and most likely this is not a unique phenomenon) - I am not truly interested if I got the "answer" right. I am more interested in if my thought process was running down the "correct" path.
I have been keeping some notes (excuse me while I hype OneNote for a second) on all the QotD's I answer along with the "thought" process behind my answer (I also note if I totally mess up and where I went wrong). In looking through the notes, I have found, the more QotD's I answer, the better my thought process has been.
Interesting note: still screwing up on the correct answer portion. The minute details of an exactly process/procedure/feature still escape me. I still get hit by the little gotcha's. I figure once I have a "proven" track record for understanding/thought process, I will start working on remembering the details.
November 5, 2013 at 10:21 am
Really easy - thanks, Steve!
November 5, 2013 at 2:04 pm
Heh... I had to think about it. For me, the correct answer would have started with "Exec xp_CmdShell". 😀
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 5, 2013 at 2:05 pm
Jeff Moden (11/5/2013)
Heh... I had to think about it. For me, the correct answer would have started with "Exec xp_CmdShell". 😀
not sp_configure??
:w00t::-D
Jason...AKA CirqueDeSQLeil
_______________________________________________
I have given a name to my pain...MCM SQL Server, MVP
SQL RNNR
Posting Performance Based Questions - Gail Shaw[/url]
Learn Extended Events
November 5, 2013 at 2:11 pm
SQLRNNR (11/5/2013)
Jeff Moden (11/5/2013)
Heh... I had to think about it. For me, the correct answer would have started with "Exec xp_CmdShell". 😀not sp_configure??
:w00t::-D
Heck no. I leave xp_CmdShell on all the time. There's no security advantage to turning it off.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 5, 2013 at 2:12 pm
Jeff Moden (11/5/2013)
SQLRNNR (11/5/2013)
Jeff Moden (11/5/2013)
Heh... I had to think about it. For me, the correct answer would have started with "Exec xp_CmdShell". 😀not sp_configure??
:w00t::-D
Heck no. I leave xp_CmdShell on all the time. There's no security advantage to turning it off.
😎
Jason...AKA CirqueDeSQLeil
_______________________________________________
I have given a name to my pain...MCM SQL Server, MVP
SQL RNNR
Posting Performance Based Questions - Gail Shaw[/url]
Learn Extended Events
November 6, 2013 at 6:56 am
Jeff Moden (11/5/2013)
SQLRNNR (11/5/2013)
Jeff Moden (11/5/2013)
Heh... I had to think about it. For me, the correct answer would have started with "Exec xp_CmdShell". 😀not sp_configure??
:w00t::-D
Heck no. I leave xp_CmdShell on all the time. There's no security advantage to turning it off.
+1 😀
November 10, 2013 at 10:32 pm
Dana Medley (11/6/2013)
Jeff Moden (11/5/2013)
SQLRNNR (11/5/2013)
Jeff Moden (11/5/2013)
Heh... I had to think about it. For me, the correct answer would have started with "Exec xp_CmdShell". 😀not sp_configure??
:w00t::-D
Heck no. I leave xp_CmdShell on all the time. There's no security advantage to turning it off.
+1 😀
+2. 🙂
November 11, 2013 at 6:07 am
Never used the SQLCMD before; but I guessed it right; lol 🙂
Thanks & Best Regards,
Hany Helmy
SQL Server Database Consultant
November 12, 2013 at 12:11 am
Nice question. We just went the route of genericizing some scripts using sqlcmd and having access to it within SSMS is a nice feature for developing those. Best of both worlds, IDE for dev, command line for automation, and no xp_cmdshell thank you very much 😀
There are no special teachers of virtue, because virtue is taught by the whole community.
--Plato
November 19, 2013 at 2:17 pm
Jeff Moden (11/5/2013)
SQLRNNR (11/5/2013)
Jeff Moden (11/5/2013)
Heh... I had to think about it. For me, the correct answer would have started with "Exec xp_CmdShell". 😀not sp_configure??
:w00t::-D
Heck no. I leave xp_CmdShell on all the time. There's no security advantage to turning it off.
Sorry, I was lead back here looking for another previous post. Your statement requires qualification Jeff.
Maybe in some environments that is true enough, obviosuly it is in your environment and fo ryou, but in general you're statement is incorrect. Having xp_cmdshell enabled reduces the overall security and auditability of an instance.
There are no special teachers of virtue, because virtue is taught by the whole community.
--Plato
November 20, 2013 at 3:24 pm
opc.three (11/19/2013)
Jeff Moden (11/5/2013)
SQLRNNR (11/5/2013)
Jeff Moden (11/5/2013)
Heh... I had to think about it. For me, the correct answer would have started with "Exec xp_CmdShell". 😀not sp_configure??
:w00t::-D
Heck no. I leave xp_CmdShell on all the time. There's no security advantage to turning it off.
Sorry, I was lead back here looking for another previous post. Your statement requires qualification Jeff.
Maybe in some environments that is true enough, obviosuly it is in your environment and fo ryou, but in general you're statement is incorrect. Having xp_cmdshell enabled reduces the overall security and auditability of an instance.
No, its not. It's just wrong for you and what you believe.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 28 total)
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply