August 13, 2003 at 9:52 am
Hi,
I am running SQL Server 7.00.623 on Windows NT 4.0 with Serivce Pack 6.
The MSSQLServer and SQLServerAgent services are running fine, and log files both agent and errorlogs do not indicate any malfunctions.
When I try to connect to the server in EM, I get the following message:
The SQL Server \\servername is not known to be running. Are you sure you wish to connect?
Any idea on this please?
I am gonna run sqldiag and do more trouble shooting...
Much thanks in advance.
Sang Nahm
August 13, 2003 at 11:26 am
Can you ping the server? Try to access with IP address.
August 13, 2003 at 1:19 pm
Hi,
It turned out that the security patch we applied yesterday caused the problem. We tested it by removing the patch, and the server was running fine.
Bad thing is that we need to to apply the patch still.
Thank you so much for your reply.
quote:
Can you ping the server? Try to access with IP address.
August 13, 2003 at 1:21 pm
Which secuirty patch?
August 13, 2003 at 1:28 pm
It is MS03-026 security patch.
quote:
Which secuirty patch?
August 14, 2003 at 1:32 am
Have you installed any Service Packs for SQL 7?
Our latest verison of SQL 7, SP4 is 7.00.1063
SP3 is 7.00.961
You'll probably have to apply the SP before the HF
Cheers
Shawn
August 14, 2003 at 1:53 am
quote:
When I try to connect to the server in EM, I get the following message:The SQL Server \\servername is not known to be running. Are you sure you wish to connect?
I run the same configuration and get this message frequently. However, this doesn't stop EM from connecting. Eeverything works fine. Is this the case for you, too ? Do you just get this message or do you really have trouble connecting ?
We never found out why this message pops up, but since things work fine anyway, we stopped investigating. Would be nice to get the answer in this forum....
August 14, 2003 at 3:45 am
We also get this message from EM. However, in our case I think it is easily explained:
we are still in a token-ring environment and use TCP/IP as the connection type. This doesn't return the state in a quick enough manner to the slower PC's to allow EM to know that everything is fine. Once you hit connect (sometimes several times) everything should be ok.
This is an issue ONLY with EM. QA handles this connection checking differently and only gives you connect/couldn't connect.
I think I remember reading (on this site) a script that does polling to check to see which servers are currently runnning as SQL servers. Might be something to research if you need to.
AJ Ahrens
SQL DBA
Revenue Assurance Management - AT&T
Good Hunting!
AJ Ahrens
webmaster@kritter.net
August 14, 2003 at 5:14 am
quote:
This doesn't return the state in a quick enough manner to the slower PC's to allow EM to know that everything is fine.
Well, in my case EM and SQL Server run on the same machine, and I still get the message "The SQL Server is not known to be running". At least in this case it seems unlikely the message is linked to sime time-out problem, what do you think ?
August 14, 2003 at 6:39 am
I would think it would be a time out issue. This has occurred to me when our SQL server was outside of our existing firewall. I was able to solve this message in one instance by increasing the amount of time in the login time-out (seconds). From EM - Tools options advanced tab.
worth a shot...
Brian
BK
BK
August 14, 2003 at 6:53 am
When we reapplied the patch, the server stopped working again; therefore, I will take Shawn's advise and apply the service pack.
Will keep you posted.
August 14, 2003 at 7:08 am
quote:
I was able to solve this message in one instance by increasing the amount of time in the login time-out (seconds)
Hmmmm .... I tried to increase all time-out values I could find to ridiculously large values, but still the message pops up immediately when trying to connect to the Server in EM. Once the message is confirmed with "OK", the Server is immediately connected and everything is fine. Don't know why EM is complainig about it.
Viewing 12 posts - 1 through 11 (of 11 total)
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply