June 4, 2013 at 1:23 pm
My bad it looks like sql 2012 standard edition only can use 64 gig of memory (change from 2008) 2 ?, I have seen some people post this is not true, anyone else seen that. Also I have an active passive cluster, since my server has 256 Gig of Ram could I create another active/passive cluster and set aside 64 gig for this and 64 gig for the existing cluster?
June 4, 2013 at 1:32 pm
i don't think there's a limit on RAM;
the default setting is 2048 terabytes of ram as the default maximum setting until you change it to something less than what is really available;
where are you seeing 64 gig?
Lowell
June 4, 2013 at 1:34 pm
microsoft
June 4, 2013 at 1:36 pm
oops yes i see that now on this page:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc645993.aspx
Lowell
June 4, 2013 at 1:36 pm
64 GB is the limit for SQL Server 2012 Standard Edition
Memory Supported by the Editions of SQL Server
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms143685(v=sql.105).aspx
June 4, 2013 at 1:39 pm
that sucks but it looks like I could setup multiple instances using sql standard edition, which would give me 2 active passive clusters
June 4, 2013 at 3:00 pm
That's not a new limit. SQL 2008 R2 standard edition only supported 64GB of memory.
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
June 5, 2013 at 2:00 am
GilaMonster (6/4/2013)
That's not a new limit. SQL 2008 R2 standard edition only supported 64GB of memory.
It was new to R2, though, I believe? 2008 allowed the OS limit in standard edition.
June 5, 2013 at 5:48 am
HowardW (6/5/2013)
GilaMonster (6/4/2013)
That's not a new limit. SQL 2008 R2 standard edition only supported 64GB of memory.It was new to R2, though, I believe? 2008 allowed the OS limit in standard edition.
Same limit was for SQL Server 2005.
Viewing 9 posts - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply