February 14, 2010 at 1:56 pm
Jorge Segarra (2/14/2010)
Actually to add to your excitement, that line is a little misleading.
Yes, that's what I meant when I said MS must have forgotten to change BOL.
Tom
March 16, 2010 at 10:00 am
Tom.Thomson (2/12/2010)
A very useful question. I've learned something new. Policy-based management begins to look more useful.But I guess MS must have changed their mind at some point but forgot to change BOL. The very first sentence in the Administering Servers by Using Policy-Based Management section (http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb510667.aspx) is
Policy-Based Management is a system for managing one or more instances of SQL Server 2008.
- and that was last updated as recently as November 2009.
Great question, I am glad it came up. I just taught an upgrade class from 2005 to 2008 and BOL had also led me to believe that PBM was for 2008 only. I should have looked a little deeper I guess 😀
At least I have another selling point for my customers who are considering upgrading!
Keep 'em coming!
Peter Trast
Microsoft Certified ...(insert many literal strings here)
Microsoft Design Architect with Alexander Open Systems
March 16, 2010 at 1:25 pm
Thanks and I've written another article about evaluating policies on mutliple instances (SQL 2008 , 2005 and 2000), that will be published end of this month, I hope that will be more fun... 🙂
Thanks
Jay
http://www.sqldbops.com
March 30, 2010 at 10:40 am
Tough question for one measly little point.
March 30, 2010 at 1:09 pm
Hope this would be useful for all...
http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/Policy-Based+Management/69587/
Thanks
Jay
http://www.sqldbops.com
Viewing 5 posts - 16 through 19 (of 19 total)
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply