Post reply

SQL Server 2008 Build List

  • February 27, 2011 at 10:25 am

    #1292045

    That typically means you specified the instance name as "inactive" when you installed it. It's a name, but shouldn't affect the SQL Server.

    It is off topic for here. If you have issues getting this to run (I didn't see a question), please start a thread in the SS2K8 forums.

  • March 21, 2011 at 2:50 pm

    #1301594

    The SQL Server 2008 R2 Build List article "join the discussion" link takes you to this thread.

    http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/SQL+Server+2008+R2/70092/[/url]

    BTW - when is the expected SP1 release for SQL Server 2008 R2??

  • March 21, 2011 at 4:20 pm

    #1301629

    Haven't heard from anyone about Sp1 for R2 as of yet. I'd expect it soon

  • April 20, 2011 at 2:26 pm

    #1314216

    Hi Steve

    The link for CU7 (R2) has an extra http://

    Rgds

    JL

  • April 20, 2011 at 6:29 pm

    #1314273

    Thanks, CU7 is corrected.

  • May 2, 2011 at 11:08 am

    #1318572

    I appreciate the SQL build lists on SSC.com and I refer to them often. But would it be possible to add the release date of each build, CU, SP? Sometimes it's helpful to know when a patch was released.

    Thanks

  • May 2, 2011 at 1:55 pm

    #1318706

    Yikes, release date is tough. The KB articles sometimes change and their dates may not be accurate.

    Builds are for the most part released in order. The CU/SP ones sometimes cross slightly (so CU14 for SP1 might release after SP2), but can I ask what you do with this info?

  • May 2, 2011 at 2:11 pm

    #1318718

    The release date would just be a nice-to-have. I'd like to know when major service packs came out, just for reference. I know that info can be found, but it would convenient to have it on your handy list.

    For example, I recently told my management I want to begin the process of installing SQL 2005 SP4. I'd like to be able to tell them the SP has been out for X number of months, or it was released on X date. It would be real easy if I could just grab that date from your list.

  • May 2, 2011 at 6:12 pm

    #1318813

    Fair enough. Getting SP dates is easy. CUs might be harder, but I'll look into adding them.

  • May 6, 2011 at 11:49 am

    #1321200

    Steve if you hit the join the discussion link on the SQL 2008 R2 post, it brings you to this discussion?

    What version (update) are the experts recommending for SQL 2008 R2 currently?

    Thanks,

    David

  • May 6, 2011 at 12:15 pm

    #1321211

    AFAIK, most people are still running with SPs. I haven't seen much positive or negative on the R2 CUs.

    I'll check the R2 link

  • July 25, 2011 at 6:42 am

    #1357725

    Please check the following link for whole list of fixes.

    http://sqlserverbuilds.blogspot.com/

  • July 25, 2011 at 6:57 am

    #1357740

    we are running a build that I do not see on your list - now I've got to ask our Sys admin to get us up to SP1!

    Microsoft SQL Server 2008 R2 (RTM) - 10.50.1617.0 (X64) Apr 22 2011 19:23:43 Copyright (c) Microsoft Corporation Standard Edition (64-bit) on Windows NT 6.0 <X64> (Build 6002: Service Pack 2) (Hypervisor)

  • July 25, 2011 at 7:49 am

    #1357776

    Thanks. Definitely bookmarking that list at http://sqlserverbuilds.blogspot.com/

  • July 25, 2011 at 9:44 am

    #1357892

    Another one I've used is: http://www.sqlsecurity.com/FAQs/SQLServerVersionDatabase/tabid/63/Default.aspx

    Gaby________________________________________________________________"In theory, theory and practice are the same. In practice, they are not." - Albert Einstein

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 41 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply