August 29, 2008 at 2:31 am
Any of you have any idea why SQL Server 2005 is having CASE Senstive Schemaname.tablename collection.
Let say i am having Schema Person in which i am having table Contact,
then person.contact will never work, you will have to enter it as according to you declared Person.Contact. (with a default installation)
Regards,
Manoj
August 29, 2008 at 2:57 am
Hi
Check the collation of your server and database.
"Keep Trying"
August 29, 2008 at 4:11 am
Thanks for reply chirag.
I have used the word "default" in the question.
Regards
Manoj
September 4, 2008 at 6:43 pm
Sounds like SQL Server was setup with Binary Sort as the default collation. I would also bet that all your column names, table names, etc are case sensitive as well. Also, all queries that use the default sort would also be case sensitive.
Binary Sort is a pain until you get used to it. Then it just becomes second nature. 🙂
Gary Johnson
Sr Database Engineer
September 5, 2008 at 4:27 am
i mean to say comparing with SQL 2000
selecting serverproparty('collation') will return defaulr SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS (if i am not wrong).
but As 2005 introduce Schema feature which becomes
Case-Sensitive combination of schema and tablename.
which becomes more tedious job then earlier.
Regards
Manoj
Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply