December 28, 2010 at 9:18 am
I am not getting the output in desired format.
I tried the solution that you provided. Do I need to do nested xml? to get the nodes as below:
<entry emp_cd="4400" last_name="Passela" first_name="Lucia" user_name="4400" hiredate="01/01/2010" birthdate="01/01/1980" >
<position code="1010" primary="Y" org_cd="5156" org_level_cd="STORE" eff_date="01/01/2010" />
<status code="ACTIVE" eff_date="01/01/2010" />
<payrate value="20.5" unit_cd="HOUR" type_cd="BASE" eff_date="01/01/2010"/>
<schedplan code="NYFTH" eff_date="01/01/2010"/>
<payplan code="NYFTH" eff_date="01/01/2010"/>
</entry>
</empload>
Thanks.
December 28, 2010 at 11:26 am
lsurapaneni (12/28/2010)
I am not getting the output in desired format.I tried the solution that you provided. Do I need to do nested xml? to get the nodes as below:
<entry emp_cd="4400" last_name="Passela" first_name="Lucia" user_name="4400" hiredate="01/01/2010" birthdate="01/01/1980" >
<position code="1010" primary="Y" org_cd="5156" org_level_cd="STORE" eff_date="01/01/2010" />
<status code="ACTIVE" eff_date="01/01/2010" />
<payrate value="20.5" unit_cd="HOUR" type_cd="BASE" eff_date="01/01/2010"/>
<schedplan code="NYFTH" eff_date="01/01/2010"/>
<payplan code="NYFTH" eff_date="01/01/2010"/>
</entry>
</empload>
Thanks.
That's strange...
Your desired output looks almost exactly like the one you requested in an earlier post.
Except for the fact of the missing header line info.
Did you follow our advice and leave the data type as varchar(max) instead of xml (see Matt's most recent post)?
If the data type still is varchar(max) and you used the code Wayne posted, what is the difference to your expected output? I simply can't find it...
December 29, 2010 at 3:05 am
Try the followinq Query :
select * from empoyees
order by emp_code
for XML RAW ('Entry). This will bring the data in the Raw format. After that you have to add the encoding tag and make the output as a XML File.
Viewing 3 posts - 16 through 17 (of 17 total)
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply