August 21, 2009 at 3:29 pm
Jamie Longstreet (8/21/2009)
Excellent question.First because it demonstrates the MERGE,
Second because it illustrates the $action,
Nice one!
Actually, I was going to say much the same but got a bit sidetracked by the answer confusion... I didn't know about MERGE before but thanks to this QotD it's clear how it works and it will be most helpful in solving a problem I have at work without resorting to extra and less efficient processing.
Cheers!
August 22, 2009 at 7:28 am
Jamie Longstreet (8/21/2009)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Excellent question.
First because it demonstrates the MERGE,
Second because it illustrates the $action,
Nice one!
dave.farmer
Actually, I was going to say much the same but got a bit sidetracked by the answer confusion... I didn't know about MERGE before but thanks to this QotD it's clear how it works and it will be most helpful in solving a problem I have at work without resorting to extra and less efficient processing.Cheers!
Thank you for your responses, it is satisfying to recieve affirmation that the QOD has achieved at least a portion of its objective.
September 1, 2009 at 9:09 am
Good question!
November 20, 2009 at 10:50 pm
I was lucky :hehe: I got it right!
March 19, 2010 at 9:59 pm
A nice question. I was lucky enough to see it after the wording was changed to reduce the number of correct answers to one.
But I do feel that this question illustrates how nasty MERGE is - we were better off without it, at least from the point of view of code clarity.
Tom
Viewing 5 posts - 16 through 19 (of 19 total)
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply