November 27, 2019 at 12:00 am
Comments posted to this topic are about the item Sorting the Data Frame
November 27, 2019 at 9:06 am
The 2nd and 4th answers appear to be the same?
November 27, 2019 at 10:43 am
I'll defer answering until Steve has sorted this one out.
November 27, 2019 at 11:56 am
I picked the second one, which has the same value than the last one.. But I got a wrong answer :'(
A. Mauricio Repetto
ML Engineer
November 27, 2019 at 5:43 pm
SADSAC is right they are the same.
Russ
November 27, 2019 at 6:52 pm
Would the following also work?
> passing.2019[order(-TD.2019,]
November 27, 2019 at 7:54 pm
Updated the answers, apologies. I'll try to see if I can get correct those that answered #2 to #4.
November 28, 2019 at 1:30 am
Would the following also work?
> passing.2019[order(-TD.2019,]
Good catch. Yes, > passing.2019[order(-TD.2019),] works like > passing.2019[order(TD.2019, decreasing = TRUE),]. But your code: > passing.2019[order(-TD.2019,] gives a syntax error. There is missing right parenthesis at (-TD.2019,
November 28, 2019 at 6:04 am
Reading the comments makes me glad i didn't answer yesterday
____________________________________________
Space, the final frontier? not any more...
All limits henceforth are self-imposed.
“libera tute vulgaris ex”
November 28, 2019 at 7:46 am
Thanks for fixing the possible responses. It sure makes it easier to answer correctly!
Viewing 10 posts - 1 through 9 (of 9 total)
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply