SELECT question

Question

Post reply

SELECT question

gary.morey

SSC Eights!

Points: 817
More actions
December 9, 2013 at 1:12 pm

#287344

I have 2 tables. Each one has the following columns: SSN, PKT and FICE_NBR.
I need to be able to retrieve the rows from table A where the combo of SSN and PKT and FICE_NBR in table A do not equal the combo of SSN and PKT and FICE_NBR in table B. Each of the tables has approx. 4 million rows.
I need to be able to include all of the columns from table A in the result set. The columns from table B are not required in the result set.
Any thoughts on the best way to write the SQL for this query?
Any help would be appreciated.

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 15 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply

gary.morey SSC Eights! Points: 817 More actions · Answer 1

I forgot to mention that I need to exclude duplicate rows from the result set.

Thanks.

Aram Koukia SSCommitted Points: 1521 More actions · Answer 2

gary.morey (12/9/2013)
I have 2 tables. Each one has the following columns: SSN, PKT and FICE_NBR.
I need to be able to retrieve the rows from table A where the combo of SSN and PKT and FICE_NBR in table A do not equal the combo of SSN and PKT and FICE_NBR in table B. Each of the tables has approx. 4 million rows.
I need to be able to include all of the columns from table A in the result set. The columns from table B are not required in the result set.
Any thoughts on the best way to write the SQL for this query?
Any help would be appreciated.

you can go like this:

SELECT SSN , PKT , FICE_NBR

FROM A

WHERE SSN + PKT + FICE_NBR

NOT IN (

SELECT SSN + PKT + FICE_NBR

FROM B

)

and for the duplicates a DISTINCT is enough i think

like:

SELECT DISTINCT SSN , PKT , FICE_NBR

FROM BLAH ...

[font="Courier New"]Aram Koukia: http://www.koukia.ca[/font]

Luis Cazares SSC Guru Points: 183706 More actions · Answer 3

You could use EXCEPT

SELECT SSN , PKT , FICE_NBR

FROM A

EXCEPT

SELECT SSN , PKT , FICE_NBR

FROM B

Luis C.
General Disclaimer:
Are you seriously taking the advice and code from someone from the internet without testing it? Do you at least understand it? Or can it easily kill your server?

How to post data/code on a forum to get the best help: Option 1 / Option 2

Lynn Pettis SSC Guru Points: 442467 More actions · Answer 4

Luis Cazares (12/9/2013)
You could use EXCEPT
SELECT SSN , PKT , FICE_NBR
FROM A
EXCEPT
SELECT SSN , PKT , FICE_NBR
FROM B

This?

with baserecs as (

SELECT SSN , PKT , FICE_NBR

FROM TableA

EXCEPT

SELECT SSN , PKT , FICE_NBR

FROM TableB

)

select a.*

from TableA a inner join baserecs br on (a.SSN = br.SSN and a.PKT = br.PKT and a.FICE_NBR = br.FICE_NBR);

ChrisM@Work SSC Guru Points: 186127 More actions · Answer 5

SELECT DISTINCT *

FROM Tablea a

WHERE NOT EXISTS (

SELECT 1

FROM Tableb b

WHERE b.SSN = a.SSN

AND b.PKT = a.PKT

AND b.FICE_NBR = a.FICE_NBR

)

^{“Write the query the simplest way. If through testing it becomes clear that the performance is inadequate, consider alternative query forms.” - Gail Shaw}

For fast, accurate and documented assistance in answering your questions, please read this article.
Understanding and using APPLY, (I) and (II) Paul White
Hidden RBAR: Triangular Joins / The "Numbers" or "Tally" Table: What it is and how it replaces a loop Jeff Moden

ChrisM@Work SSC Guru Points: 186127 More actions · Answer 6

Aram Koukia (12/9/2013)
gary.morey (12/9/2013)
I have 2 tables. Each one has the following columns: SSN, PKT and FICE_NBR.
I need to be able to retrieve the rows from table A where the combo of SSN and PKT and FICE_NBR in table A do not equal the combo of SSN and PKT and FICE_NBR in table B. Each of the tables has approx. 4 million rows.
I need to be able to include all of the columns from table A in the result set. The columns from table B are not required in the result set.
Any thoughts on the best way to write the SQL for this query?
Any help would be appreciated.
you can go like this:
SELECT SSN , PKT , FICE_NBR
FROM A
WHERE SSN + PKT + FICE_NBR
NOT IN (
SELECT SSN + PKT + FICE_NBR
FROM B
)
and for the duplicates a DISTINCT is enough i think
like:
SELECT DISTINCT SSN , PKT , FICE_NBR
FROM BLAH ...

1. A row in table a with SSN = 1 and PKT = 2 would match a row in table b with SSN = 2 and PKT = 1 and matching FICE_NBR. This method is not recommended where the matching columns can generate an arithmetic addition.

It can break with character data too, less likely if an unexpected character e.g. '|' separates the columns.

2. It's not SARGable. In the unlikely event that it works, performance will always be poor.

^{“Write the query the simplest way. If through testing it becomes clear that the performance is inadequate, consider alternative query forms.” - Gail Shaw}

For fast, accurate and documented assistance in answering your questions, please read this article.
Understanding and using APPLY, (I) and (II) Paul White
Hidden RBAR: Triangular Joins / The "Numbers" or "Tally" Table: What it is and how it replaces a loop Jeff Moden

Aram Koukia SSCommitted Points: 1521 More actions · Answer 7

Yes, That's right

In cases like this, when I concat column data together I always use a special character as a separator to make sure that kind of conflict won't happen.

[font="Courier New"]Aram Koukia: http://www.koukia.ca[/font]

Jeff Moden SSC Guru Points: 1004406 More actions · Answer 8

[font="Arial Black"]Personally, I'd like to know why in the hell anyone would be storing SSNs in plain text![/font]

--Jeff Moden

RBAR is pronounced "ree-bar" and is a "Modenism" for Row-By-Agonizing-Row.
First step towards the paradigm shift of writing Set Based code:
________Stop thinking about what you want to do to a ROW... think, instead, of what you want to do to a COLUMN.

Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.

Helpful Links:
How to post code problems
How to Post Performance Problems
Create a Tally Function (fnTally)

David Burrows SSC Guru Points: 65143 More actions · Answer 9

Jeff Moden (12/10/2013)
[font="Arial Black"]Personally, I'd like to know why in the hell anyone would be storing SSNs in plain text![/font]

Are you assuming combo = combination = concatenation 😀

Far away is close at hand in the images of elsewhere.
Anon.

gary.morey SSC Eights! Points: 817 More actions · Answer 10

gary.morey

SSC Eights!

Points: 817

December 11, 2013 at 6:44 am

#1672603

The SSN is stored as a hashed value.

gary.morey SSC Eights! Points: 817 More actions · Answer 11

The SSN is stored as a MD5 hashed value.

The combination of SSN, PKT and FICE_NBR in table A does not have a match on the combination of SSN, PKT and FICE_NBR in table B.

ChrisM@Work SSC Guru Points: 186127 More actions · Answer 12

gary.morey (12/11/2013)
The SSN is stored as a MD5 hashed value.
The combination of SSN, PKT and FICE_NBR in table A does not have a match on the combination of SSN, PKT and FICE_NBR in table B.

You were probably expecting matches, Gary. Can you post the query you used?

^{“Write the query the simplest way. If through testing it becomes clear that the performance is inadequate, consider alternative query forms.” - Gail Shaw}

For fast, accurate and documented assistance in answering your questions, please read this article.
Understanding and using APPLY, (I) and (II) Paul White
Hidden RBAR: Triangular Joins / The "Numbers" or "Tally" Table: What it is and how it replaces a loop Jeff Moden

gary.morey SSC Eights! Points: 817 More actions · Answer 13

SELECT *

FROM Temp_BigTable

WHERE SSN + PKT + FICE_NBR

NOT IN (

SELECT SSN + PKT + FICE_NBR

FROM shi.raw33

)

Jeff Moden SSC Guru Points: 1004406 More actions · Answer 14

gary.morey (12/11/2013)
The SSN is stored as a MD5 hashed value.
The combination of SSN, PKT and FICE_NBR in table A does not have a match on the combination of SSN, PKT and FICE_NBR in table B.

Ah, thanks, Gary. I feel much better now.

Shifting gears a bit, you might want to consider something a little bit more than simple MDF hashing. A simple billion row rainbow table (which is nothing on the machines today) would quickly unravel all of the SSNs. Even adding a salt to the MD5 would be better although that would likely still fail an audit.

--Jeff Moden

RBAR is pronounced "ree-bar" and is a "Modenism" for Row-By-Agonizing-Row.
First step towards the paradigm shift of writing Set Based code:
________Stop thinking about what you want to do to a ROW... think, instead, of what you want to do to a COLUMN.

Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.

Helpful Links:
How to post code problems
How to Post Performance Problems
Create a Tally Function (fnTally)