Post reply

Restore of the Database

  • May 9, 2016 at 7:07 am

    #1877472

    Hi,

    Please check the correct answer!!!

    The official Microsoft documentation informs the operation of verifyonly is written in the table.

    To learn more visit: https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms187408.aspx

  • May 9, 2016 at 8:49 am

    #1877505

    Junior Galvão - MVP (5/9/2016)

    Hi,

    Please check the correct answer!!!

    The official Microsoft documentation informs the operation of verifyonly is written in the table.

    To learn more visit: https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms187408.aspx%5B/quote%5D

    Uhmmm... This question is 6 years old :w00t:

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------
    A little knowledge is a dangerous thing (Alexander Pope)
    In order for us to help you as efficiently as possible, please read this before posting (courtesy of Jeff Moden)[/url]

  • May 10, 2016 at 3:54 pm

    #1878005

    Jan Van der Eecken (5/9/2016)

    Junior Galvão - MVP (5/9/2016)

    Hi,

    Please check the correct answer!!!

    The official Microsoft documentation informs the operation of verifyonly is written in the table.

    To learn more visit: https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms187408.aspx%5B/quote%5D

    Uhmmm... This question is 6 years old :w00t:

    So it's been standing there wrong - uncorrected - for 7 (not 6) years despite the error having been pointed out 7 years ago. How many people have looked at it and been misled during those 7 years? Do we want SQLServerCentral to carry on misleading people for ever, or should people who spot the uncorrected error comment on it in the hope that it may be fixed even at this late date so that it won't mislead people in the future? If that's a forlorn hope, what does that say about the site? And if you think people shouldn't comment, what does that say about you?

    Tom

Viewing 3 posts - 16 through 17 (of 17 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply