Repairing with DBCC CHECKDB

Question

Repairing with DBCC CHECKDB

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 30 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply

Mark D Powell SSCarpal Tunnel Points: 4775 More actions · Answer 1

The question specifically states 2008+ and on 2008 the syntax is invalid. The first answer is the correct answer, not the answer you indicate.

EL Jerry SSCertifiable Points: 7063 More actions · Answer 2

Got me on this one because I read an old version of BOL. I knew there was a syntax error but I focused only on the words and not the punctuation.

I should pay attention to versions in later QOTDs.:-D

Happy weekend everyone!!!

"El" Jerry.

"A watt of Ottawa" - Gerardo Galvan

To better understand your help request, please follow these best practices.[/url]

Andre Ranieri SSCrazy Points: 2819 More actions · Answer 3

I got this one wrong (or right) because my answer assumes that DBCC CheckDB requires a database name, and in parentheses. At any rate, I didn't get the point but it was nice to brush up on some SQL history.

Thanks.

David Smerchek Ten Centuries Points: 1297 More actions · Answer 4

in SQL 2012 running this you will get a syntex error near ","

mtassin SSC-Insane Points: 23099 More actions · Answer 5

I got this right because my copy of Local Transact SQL Help says as does BOL

' database_name ' | database_id | 0
Is the name or ID of the database for which to run integrity checks. If not specified, or if 0 is specified, the current database is used. Database names must comply with the rules for identifiers.
REPAIR_ALLOW_DATA_LOSS | REPAIR_FAST | REPAIR_REBUILD
Specifies that DBCC CHECKDB repair the found errors. The specified database must be in single-user mode to use one of the following repair options.

I read it such that if you don't specify a database it will default to the current one. I guess not with the REPAIR commands?

Originally I thought it was an error... but reading that it seems that it should be right... it's not... but I think it should be.

--Mark Tassin
MCITP - SQL Server DBA
Proud member of the Anti-RBAR alliance.
For help with Performance click this link[/url]
For tips on how to post your problems[/url]

Steve Jones - SSC Editor SSC Guru Points: 736494 More actions · Answer 6

The typo has been corrected and points awarded back.

My apologies for the typo.

Andre Ranieri SSCrazy Points: 2819 More actions · Answer 7

As a point of intellectual curiosity, when I run this against my sandbox database (SQL 2008 R2) I get an error that the database needs to be in single user mode.

Thanks again for everything. I start every morning with the SSC QoTD, and it has taught me an awful lot.

Andre Ranieri

OzYbOi d(-_-)b SSCarpal Tunnel Points: 4054 More actions · Answer 8

OzYbOi d(-_-)b

SSCarpal Tunnel

Points: 4054

June 15, 2012 at 9:34 am

#1501757

Thanks for the question - cheers

chrisfradenburg SSCrazy Eights Points: 9592 More actions · Answer 9

Good question. I knew it wasn't valid any more but had forgotten that it wouldn't error.

SQLRNNR SSC Guru Points: 281334 More actions · Answer 10

Thanks Tom.

Jason...AKA CirqueDeSQLeil
_______________________________________________
I have given a name to my pain...MCM SQL Server, MVP
SQL RNNR
Posting Performance Based Questions - Gail Shaw[/url]
Learn Extended Events

zymos SSCommitted Points: 1960 More actions · Answer 11

Easy one and no repairs would be done in this case.

Thanks.

Toreador SSChampion Points: 11368 More actions · Answer 12

Am I allowed to complain that I got an error because I have no such database as Adventureworks? 😉

I knew that repair_fast no longer worked, but guessed wrong that it would fail with an error rather than just being ignored. I hate it when MS do this - backward compatibility is all very well but in some cases can lead you to think that an action has completed successfully rather than doing nothing! Am I the only one who'd rather start getting error messages so I knew I had to fix my code?

TomThomson SSC Guru Points: 104773 More actions · Answer 13

I knew that repair_fast no longer worked, but guessed wrong that it would fail with an error rather than just being ignored. I hate it when MS do this - backward compatibility is all very well but in some cases can lead you to think that an action has completed successfully rather than doing nothing! Am I the only one who'd rather start getting error messages so I knew I had to fix my code?

You're certainly not the only one. A warning message might be OK instead of an error, but quietly doing nothing is irritating.

edit:spelling!

Tom

Neha05 Default port Points: 1494 More actions · Answer 14

Neha05

Default port

Points: 1494

August 9, 2012 at 8:33 am

#1523826

Good question!

kapil_kk SSC-Insane Points: 21316 More actions · Answer 15

hi,

Can anyone tell me How to check whether the database is in single user mode or multi user mode?

_______________________________________________________________
To get quick answer follow this link:
http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/Best+Practices/61537/