December 20, 2018 at 12:03 am
Comments posted to this topic are about the item Removing Extended Properties
December 20, 2018 at 8:38 am
I have to agree with the customer. Having meta-data that identifies a column in such a fashion is as dumb as labeling a column as "SSN" or "TaxID" even when the column data is encrypted. It's a "flare" saying "Hello Mr. Attacker... let me save you some time so you can do a simple query on all column names to find exactly which columns you want for your payload".
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
December 20, 2018 at 2:02 pm
I see both sides. If the data is moved/masked, not sure there is a reason not to keep this metadata. Developers need to know this for work, to handle requirements and features.
But, it's worth having a way to do this for people that think it's important.
July 31, 2020 at 8:22 am
As a FoRG I've had some interesting calls with the Data Catalog team. The RedGate Data Catalog will pick up these values from the database as well as supporting many more out-of-the-box and useful properties.
In my organisation we colour categorise data and determine an action with regard to export to other systems
The challenge we have is how to make this visible to data consumers. I think it would be great if RedGate SQLDoc had the capability to hook into RedGate Data Catalog to supplement the the usual table/view column definitions with relevant metadata from the catalog.
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply