RAID

Question

Post reply

RAID

Viewing 9 posts - 16 through 23 (of 23 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply

Tee Time Hall of Fame Points: 3745 More actions · Answer 1

Tee Time

Hall of Fame

Points: 3745

December 31, 2012 at 11:45 am

#1572568

Thanks Dave! Happy New Year!:-D

SQLRNNR SSC Guru Points: 281334 More actions · Answer 2

Koen Verbeeck (12/30/2012)
W00t, easy question to close the year 😀 :w00t:
Not really sure though why a Microsoft resource is so necessary when the question itself is about a pretty universal concept.

Agreed

Jason...AKA CirqueDeSQLeil
_______________________________________________
I have given a name to my pain...MCM SQL Server, MVP
SQL RNNR
Posting Performance Based Questions - Gail Shaw[/url]
Learn Extended Events

Toreador SSChampion Points: 11365 More actions · Answer 3

Can't see the need for a Microsoft reference on a question that's about something universal. But I agree with Tom - I'd never use a Wikipedia reference as sole support for any statement.

Dineshbabu Hall of Fame Points: 3220 More actions · Answer 4

learnt in begining of college days.. easy one...

--
Dineshbabu
Desire to learn new things..

Rich Mechaber SSChampion Points: 11130 More actions · Answer 5

FYI: the "I" in the original paper stood for "Inexpensive":

http://www-2.cs.cmu.edu/~garth/RAIDpaper/Patterson88.pdf

Rich

Ken SSCoach Points: 17191 More actions · Answer 6

Toreador (1/2/2013)
Can't see the need for a Microsoft reference on a question that's about something universal. But I agree with Tom - I'd never use a Wikipedia reference as sole support for any statement.

+ 1

George M Parker SSCertifiable Points: 5412 More actions · Answer 7

My Master's degree program won't let me use Wikipedia at all... If it doesn't come from the university library as a scholarly resource, use it at your own risk... 😀

sipas Hall of Fame Points: 3828 More actions · Answer 8

rmechaber (1/2/2013)
FYI: the "I" in the original paper stood for "Inexpensive":
http://www-2.cs.cmu.edu/~garth/RAIDpaper/Patterson88.pdf
Rich

Yes, 'independent' is misleading - how are disks in RAID 5 'independent' when the data is striped across them? And in RAID 0 the disks are obviously wholly dependent on each other. They're only independent in RAID 1 or RAID 10.

I know it's all over the web and text books now, but it's wrong. Gartner has a definition on its website headed RAID (Redundant Array Of Independent Disks), which says under RAID 0 'if one drive fails, the entire disk array subsystem is unavailable'??!?

It's not specific to Microsoft and so doesn't require a Microsoft reference.

Just to be (even more?) pedantic, 'independent' is not spelt 'independant'.

seatedElephant Say Hey Kid Points: 674 More actions · Answer 9

Thanks to you all for your thoughts on my question. It keeps me thinking and learning, which is why I'm here.

All the best for 2013.

Dave.

Dave Morris :alien:

"Measure twice, saw once"