March 3, 2011 at 9:56 pm
Thanks for the question...these RAID questions are nice, they let you think a bit 😉
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This thing is addressing problems that dont exist. Its solution-ism at its worst. We are dumbing down machines that are inherently superior. - Gilfoyle
March 3, 2011 at 11:46 pm
Dammit, I got it wrong because of this misleading quote in Wikipedia:
RAID 1+0: mirrored sets in a striped set (minimum two disks but more commonly four disks to take advantage of speed benefits; even number of disks)
On most other sites I've found 4 as a minimum. (after I've answered the question of course)
Damn you Wikipedia, you have fooled me once again! 🙂
Need an answer? No, you need a question
My blog at https://sqlkover.com.
MCSE Business Intelligence - Microsoft Data Platform MVP
March 4, 2011 at 1:24 am
Koen Verbeeck (3/3/2011)
Dammit, I got it wrong because of this misleading quote in Wikipedia:RAID 1+0: mirrored sets in a striped set (minimum two disks but more commonly four disks to take advantage of speed benefits; even number of disks)
On most other sites I've found 4 as a minimum. (after I've answered the question of course)
Damn you Wikipedia, you have fooled me once again! 🙂
Same for me.
March 4, 2011 at 1:46 am
This was removed by the editor as SPAM
March 4, 2011 at 1:54 am
Thanks for the question. I took a chance and got it right 🙂
There were conflicting answers on the net.
Learnt something as well through QotD.
For RAID5 minimum number of drives is 3
For RAID10 minimum number of drives is 4.
M&M
March 4, 2011 at 2:57 am
I was about to answer 4 from my own knowledge but then looked it up to be sure and found this:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nested_RAID_levels
It quotes:
RAID 10 can be implemented with as few as two disks. Implementations supporting two disks such as Linux RAID10 offer a choice of layouts, including one in which copies of a block of data are "near" each other or at the same address on different devices or predictably offset: Each disk access is split into full-speed disk accesses to different drives, yielding read and write performance like RAID0 but without necessarily guaranteeing every stripe is on both drives.
Therefore, the correct answer should be 2 like I answered. Usually it's 4 but there is this possibility of 2 and the question asked for the minimum not the "usual."
March 4, 2011 at 5:03 am
I went against my better judgement and answered 2 - since I also read
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nested_RAID_levels
Oh well - Nice to know I'm not the only one - though next time I'll trust myself.
March 4, 2011 at 5:17 am
Well, this time I shouldn't have done the research...
I read the exact article that was quoted in the question, and found this quote:
RAID 1+0: mirrored sets in a striped set (minimum two disks but more commonly four disks to take advantage of speed benefits; even number of disks) provides fault tolerance and improved performance but increases complexity.
So I answered 2, rather than 4. My bad for believing wikipedia, I guess - and my surprise that this article was the one that was cited for the reference.
-Ki
-Ki
March 4, 2011 at 6:28 am
Yeah, I think a lot of people are going to get this "wrong" since we read the Wikipedia article. Which, hilariously, is linked in the answer.
March 4, 2011 at 6:44 am
Hmmmm. If it hadn't linked the Wikipedia article I got the wrong answer of 2 from I'd have been fine, but when the reference quoted in the real answer supports what I said but the answer doesn't...
March 4, 2011 at 6:44 am
I like a lot of people answered two for the same reason
RAID 1+0: mirrored sets in a striped set (minimum two disks but more commonly four disks to take advantage of speed benefits; even number of disks) provides fault tolerance and improved performance but increases complexity
The question was not the best optimal configuration but the minimum.
March 4, 2011 at 6:56 am
I have to agree that most are going to fail this one because of conflicting information. Question specifies "minimum" not "optimal". 🙁
March 4, 2011 at 8:09 am
Should have trusted my own instincts. Wikipedia ruined my ans.
March 4, 2011 at 8:18 am
I would have sworn that the RAID 1+0 was 4 in Wikipedia, and I have submitted a correction.
Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 24 total)
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply