December 5, 2010 at 2:48 pm
We all know that Production DBs are kept on a different server than Dev or Rep.
If i want to mirror the DBs on Prod server where do i keep the mirror ?
I have 3 Servers (Prod, Dev, Reporting)
Please suggest. I know its a dumb question bt.. 😛
[font="Verdana"]
Today is the tomorrow you worried about yesterday:-)[/font]
December 5, 2010 at 3:03 pm
allin1 (12/5/2010)
If i want to mirror the DBs on Prod server where do i keep the mirror ?
On a second production server. They're production databases and should the principal fail that server will become the production server.
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
December 5, 2010 at 3:45 pm
So, is there any other way to do it ? if we cannot afford a second production server?
[font="Verdana"]
Today is the tomorrow you worried about yesterday:-)[/font]
December 5, 2010 at 3:57 pm
If you put the mirror onto reporting or dev, think what will happen if there's a failover and the reporting or (heaven forbid) dev server is hosting the active production databases with full production load. Think about hardware capabilities, think about security. As you said, production needs to be a separate environment.
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
December 6, 2010 at 11:31 am
Thanks for the valuable feedback. I have one more follow up question, assuming that i have a stand by server to mirror the prod DBs and the server is in the Prod Network.
Niw Do I have to buy two licenses (2 X 25k $) OR since this is a type of failover I am safe installing in on the standby server server as long as querries are not being executed against the standby server ?
[font="Verdana"]
Today is the tomorrow you worried about yesterday:-)[/font]
December 6, 2010 at 11:50 am
Not a lawyer, but my understanding is that standby servers not being used do not need a separate license.
December 6, 2010 at 2:59 pm
Just to confirm what Steve said- as per MS:
http://www.microsoft.com/sql/howtobuy/sqlserverlicensing.mspx
"A passive server does not need a license if the number of processors in the passive server is equal to or less than the number of processors in the active server."
But keep in mind that "The passive server can take the duties of the active server for 30 days. Afterwards, it must be licensed accordingly.
"
December 6, 2010 at 6:15 pm
Thanks Guys.
It Makes sense now.
[font="Verdana"]
Today is the tomorrow you worried about yesterday:-)[/font]
Viewing 8 posts - 1 through 7 (of 7 total)
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply