QOD 6/16

Question

Post reply

QOD 6/16

Frank Kalis

SSC Guru

Points: 111183
More actions
June 16, 2003 at 12:33 am

#160379

I guess, this question will also causes some 'trouble'. I haven't answered it yet, but I remember an article from SQL Server Mag some month ago titled 'The 64-bit question'.
...the most significant.. is a massive increase in addressable memory. ..It supports as much as 32TB of adressable memory and neraly unlimited amount of virtual memory running on Windows Server 2003....So far, Microsoft has tested...on systems that have as much as 256GB of RAM.
Hmm,...32TB is not an option on the answer. 256GB is not an option on the answer.
I'll go for 512GB and watch this thread!
Cheers,
Frank
--
Frank Kalis
Microsoft SQL Server MVP
Webmaster: http://www.insidesql.org/blogs
My blog: http://www.insidesql.org/blogs/frankkalis/[/url]

Viewing 8 posts - 1 through 7 (of 7 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply

Frank Kalis SSC Guru Points: 111183 More actions · Answer 1

Hi Brian Knight,

I've answered the question. And don't post my answer...

but I would like to know on your explanation to the answer. Where did you get this from?

Cheers,

Frank

--
Frank Kalis
Microsoft SQL Server MVP
Webmaster: http://www.insidesql.org/blogs
My blog: http://www.insidesql.org/blogs/frankkalis/[/url]

Ferks Default port Points: 1410 More actions · Answer 2

I guessed the Answer, but only because I knew that SQL 2000 Enterprise used up to 64Gb and MS usually have to surpass the previous edition by expansion!

Anyway, is there anyone out there running SQL 2000 Enterprise on a Win 2003 Datacentre apart from Microsoft?

Can't be many....

Ferks

Antares686 SSC Guru Points: 125444 More actions · Answer 3

I read this a few weeks ago. But here take alook at the comparison at the bottom. http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserver2003/evaluation/overview/family.mspx And note the question did state Datacenter.