December 17, 2003 at 8:04 am
I did answer the first question correctly, but not the second. I assumed that the email would have the same question as the question in the link. Guess that tests something that DBAs should normally do - double check.
RandyHelpdesk: Perhaps Im not the only one that does not know what you are doing. 😉
December 17, 2003 at 8:12 am
Could you guys look at SQLBill's suggestion in the topic called "QOD Suggestion". What do you think about that?
Brian Knight
http://www.sqlservercentral.com/columnists/bknight
Brian Knight
Free SQL Server Training Webinars
December 17, 2003 at 8:59 am
I found it interesting that the email received had the correct DESC (second choice) but on the website the DESC was missing. This of course lead me to change my answer to none of the above. Bummer
I have to agree though I like the QODs since they cause me to think about areas I do not normally have to deal with.
SmithDM
SmithDM
December 17, 2003 at 9:11 am
It was very tricky ... and annoying. The next QOD should be: "write a query to grant 2 points to all people that answered "none of the above"
December 17, 2003 at 9:13 am
SmithDM, it's the other way around. Ordering by DESC will put the greatest sales on top - therefore you will get a list of your top performers.
I'm glad I noticed the change on the website, because I chose 'none of the above' in the e-mail, but changed it to the correct #2 answer on the web page, partly because it seemed weird to have none as the correct choice.
Since the web page was probably updated after numerous people answered 'none', maybe anyone answering 'none' before the update should get credit, because their answer actually was correct.
The only normal people are those you don't know well - Oscar Wilde
Data: Easy to spill, hard to clean up!
December 17, 2003 at 9:13 am
quote:
I found it interesting that the email received had the correct DESC (second choice) but on the website the DESC was missing. ...
I got the answer right according to the email , but didn't read the revised answer on the site (poor attention to detail on me), so I gave the incorrect answer , for which I got points . I'm so conflicted! Guess I'm glad that I'm sad about being happy.
December 17, 2003 at 9:29 am
If you put the order by asc you will get the bottom 5 ....
Deborah Talley
Deborah Talley
December 17, 2003 at 9:40 am
As many pinted out, the problem was the one of the proposed answers was different in e-mails on the web site. I'm serious, all people that had aswered "none of the above" should get credit.
December 17, 2003 at 12:13 pm
Maybe I understood Brian Knight's post wrong, but there is a second chance to answer. At least I had to answer a second time.
Frank
--
Frank Kalis
Microsoft SQL Server MVP
Webmaster: http://www.insidesql.org/blogs
My blog: http://www.insidesql.org/blogs/frankkalis/[/url]
December 17, 2003 at 1:16 pm
I didn't get a second chance.
RandyHelpdesk: Perhaps Im not the only one that does not know what you are doing. 😉
December 17, 2003 at 1:26 pm
quote:
I didn't get a second chance.
I blew away all the people who answered to give them a second chance after I corrected the answer. If you answered after then though, you mayve missed that second chance but the answer was corrected.
Brian Knight
http://www.sqlservercentral.com/columnists/bknight
Brian Knight
Free SQL Server Training Webinars
December 17, 2003 at 1:44 pm
Hey guys! Lighten up its just a game to help us learn and mistakes happen.
December 18, 2003 at 2:10 am
quote:
Hey guys! Lighten up its just a game to help us learn and mistakes happen.
Yeh true but it looks like it's getting competitive
Far away is close at hand in the images of elsewhere.
Anon.
December 18, 2003 at 2:13 am
Curious what will happen, when the long time promised further standings are released
Frank
--
Frank Kalis
Microsoft SQL Server MVP
Webmaster: http://www.insidesql.org/blogs
My blog: http://www.insidesql.org/blogs/frankkalis/[/url]
Viewing 14 posts - 31 through 43 (of 43 total)
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply