Poll to see how many people set Max Server Memory

  • On a packaged/COTS app forum, I was surprised to get significant, negative feedback when I suggested setting Max Server Memory. So I'm curious how many people here set it...

    Peter

    http://seattleworks.com including my blog The SQL Janitor

  • Peter Samson (8/6/2010)


    On a packaged/COTS app forum, I was surprised to get significant, negative feedback when I suggested setting Max Server Memory. So I'm curious how many people here set it...

    I'll trade you my opinion for the successful link to that. 😉

    --Jeff Moden


    RBAR is pronounced "ree-bar" and is a "Modenism" for Row-By-Agonizing-Row.
    First step towards the paradigm shift of writing Set Based code:
    ________Stop thinking about what you want to do to a ROW... think, instead, of what you want to do to a COLUMN.

    Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.


    Helpful Links:
    How to post code problems
    How to Post Performance Problems
    Create a Tally Function (fnTally)

  • There is no "Don't know/ Don't understand/ Don't care" option, this is not a scientific poll 😀

    Seriously now, for critical production databases I'll set it accordingly.

    _____________________________________
    Pablo (Paul) Berzukov

    Author of Understanding Database Administration available at Amazon and other bookstores.

    Disclaimer: Advice is provided to the best of my knowledge but no implicit or explicit warranties are provided. Since the advisor explicitly encourages testing any and all suggestions on a test non-production environment advisor should not held liable or responsible for any actions taken based on the given advice.
  • Jeff, you should be able to link to it here

    http://community.sageaccpac.com/forums/t/1193.aspx

    Peter

    http://seattleworks.com including my blog The SQL Janitor

  • We don't normally set it as a standard practice, but we watch the paging and set it if needed.


    And then again, I might be wrong ...
    David Webb

  • Peter Samson (8/6/2010)


    Jeff, you should be able to link to it here

    http://community.sageaccpac.com/forums/t/1193.aspx

    I'll have to agree with the others. I've not ever had to change this setting for performance. Following your good link further to its logical end, I suspect that rebooting the server was better for the customer than changing that particular setting.

    --Jeff Moden


    RBAR is pronounced "ree-bar" and is a "Modenism" for Row-By-Agonizing-Row.
    First step towards the paradigm shift of writing Set Based code:
    ________Stop thinking about what you want to do to a ROW... think, instead, of what you want to do to a COLUMN.

    Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.


    Helpful Links:
    How to post code problems
    How to Post Performance Problems
    Create a Tally Function (fnTally)

  • If it's a dedicated box, only running the core SQL services, then I'd agree it probably handles the amount of memory to allocate to SQL Server fairly well.

    However, if you use SSIS, SSRS or other components that require a significant amount of memory intermittently, it's worth limiting the amount SQL Server can have allocated.

  • if using BP locked pages then you should configure both min and max memory for each instance

    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    "Ya can't make an omelette without breaking just a few eggs" 😉

  • I don't typically set it unless there is good reason. We typically run dedicated servers for SQL.

    Jason...AKA CirqueDeSQLeil
    _______________________________________________
    I have given a name to my pain...MCM SQL Server, MVP
    SQL RNNR
    Posting Performance Based Questions - Gail Shaw[/url]
    Learn Extended Events

Viewing 9 posts - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply