Old Dog, New Tricks

  • jcb (2/14/2012)


    But that remember me hot discussions with a team of old dogs.

    Hey HEY!!! Be careful now! You're talking to an "old dog"! 😉

    --Jeff Moden


    RBAR is pronounced "ree-bar" and is a "Modenism" for Row-By-Agonizing-Row.
    First step towards the paradigm shift of writing Set Based code:
    ________Stop thinking about what you want to do to a ROW... think, instead, of what you want to do to a COLUMN.

    Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.


    Helpful Links:
    How to post code problems
    How to Post Performance Problems
    Create a Tally Function (fnTally)

  • Gary Varga (2/15/2012)


    Rod at work (2/14/2012)


    jcb (2/14/2012)


    Jeff Moden (2/13/2012)


    ...

    Heh... even without that bit of nightmarish code, I still find the same to be true... "sad bugs" and "bad coding".

    Sure, someday I ill print "I see bad code" in a T-shirt.:-D

    But that remember me hot discussions with a team of old dogs. My point at the time was to drop using implict joins.

    I'm pretty sure they are still coding that way.

    I hope none is working in air traffic control or ICBM launch sequences.

    I'd buy that t-shirt! 😛

    I might too but it would make me feel slightly cross whenever I put it on.

    I've considered making a T-Shirt that says, "I didn't get this old being stupid... but you might have." 😉

    --Jeff Moden


    RBAR is pronounced "ree-bar" and is a "Modenism" for Row-By-Agonizing-Row.
    First step towards the paradigm shift of writing Set Based code:
    ________Stop thinking about what you want to do to a ROW... think, instead, of what you want to do to a COLUMN.

    Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.


    Helpful Links:
    How to post code problems
    How to Post Performance Problems
    Create a Tally Function (fnTally)

  • Jeff Moden (2/15/2012)


    Gary Varga (2/15/2012)


    Rod at work (2/14/2012)


    jcb (2/14/2012)


    Jeff Moden (2/13/2012)


    ...

    Heh... even without that bit of nightmarish code, I still find the same to be true... "sad bugs" and "bad coding".

    Sure, someday I ill print "I see bad code" in a T-shirt.:-D

    But that remember me hot discussions with a team of old dogs. My point at the time was to drop using implict joins.

    I'm pretty sure they are still coding that way.

    I hope none is working in air traffic control or ICBM launch sequences.

    I'd buy that t-shirt! 😛

    I might too but it would make me feel slightly cross whenever I put it on.

    I've considered making a T-Shirt that says, "I didn't get this old being stupid... but you might have." 😉

    I will steal this one from you, Jeff.

Viewing 3 posts - 91 through 92 (of 92 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply