September 26, 2012 at 5:07 am
I have mixed feelings about this feature. When I first read about contained DB's I felt excited, because the explanation was about a lot more then just about the ease of moving a DB without the hassle of migrating logins to another server. But then I read this feature only consists about partly containment, i.e. only the independency of DB-users from serve wide logins.
We have several methods to transfer logins without a hassle. That does not mean we should NOT look at new/easier ways of doing things, but I do not think moving a DB to another server is a great or grave problem.
Let's look at a drawback of this feature. If you have several databases on an instance(I see that a lot(freelance DBA)), how can you tell quickly which users have access to data on this instance? Contained DB-users do not show up at the logins. Of course, you can use a script to create a list of all DB-users, but the whole purpose seems to be not to have to rely on scripts when moving a DB. But now we have to use a script to get all DB-users? That is progress...?
Greetz,
Hans Brouwer
Viewing post 16 (of 15 total)
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply
This website stores cookies on your computer.
These cookies are used to improve your website experience and provide more personalized services to you, both on this website and through other media.
To find out more about the cookies we use, see our Privacy Policy