Need to write query with conditioms

  • update tab1.ut_prc with tab2.prcup of seqnum in which amtperact fall under.
    for example if you take act1003, amtperact 76 fall under seqnum=2 (i.e in between min_cst and max_cst for prd1) then tab1.ut_prc should be updated with prcup of seqnum=2 for prd1 i.e.1.7
    Attached the sampe data. Please advise the options to write query for this scenario.

  • It always helps to have data. I think this is what you are looking for, but you're question is not very clear and you don't specify any expected results in the excel file

    drop table if exists #tab1
    drop table if exists #tab2

    Create table #Tab1 (
    SubNum varchar(20),
    ActNum varchar(20),
    UnitPrice decimal(5,2))

    Create table #Tab2 (
    SubNum varchar(20),
    ActNum varchar(20),
    amtperact tinyint,
    min_cst    decimal(5,2),
    max_cst    decimal(5,2),
    prcup        decimal(5,2),
    seqnum    tinyint,
    prd varchar(5))

    insert into #Tab1
    values
    ('Sub001','act1001',0.7),
    ('Sub002','act1001',0.7),
    ('Sub003','act1001',0.7),
    ('Sub004','act1002',0.7),
    ('Sub005','act1002',0.7),
    ('Sub006','act1003',0.7),
    ('Sub007','act1003',0.7),
    ('Sub008','act1003',0.7),
    ('Sub010','act1003',0.7),
    ('Sub011','act1003',0.7),
    ('Sub012','act1003',0.7)

    insert into #Tab2
    values
    ('Sub001','act1001',25,21,22,0.9,1,'prd1'),
    ('Sub002','act1001',25,24,27,1.1,2,'prd1'),
    ('Sub003','act1001',25,26,28,1.4,3,'prd1'),
    ('Sub004','act1002',27,21,22,0.9,1,'prd2'),
    ('Sub005','act1002',27,24,27,1.1,2,'prd2'),
    ('Sub006','act1003',76,74,75,1.5,1,'prd1'),
    ('Sub007','act1003',76,74,77,1.7,2,'prd1'),
    ('Sub008','act1003',76,77,78,1.8,3,'prd1'),
    ('Sub010','act1003',76,74,75,1.5,1,'prd2'),
    ('Sub011','act1003',76,74,77,1.7,2,'prd2'),
    ('Sub012','act1003',76,77,78,1.8,3,'prd2')

    select * from #Tab1
    begin tran
    update t1
    set UnitPrice = t2.prcup
    from #tab1 t1
        join #Tab2 t2
            on t1.ActNum = t2.ActNum
         where amtperact between min_cst and max_cst

    select * from #Tab1
    --rollback
            
     

    For better, quicker answers, click on the following...
    http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/Best+Practices/61537/

    For better answers on performance questions, click on the following...
    http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/SQLServerCentral/66909/

  • Please see the first link under "Helpful Links" in my signature line below for posting methods that will help us help you better and more quickly.

    --Jeff Moden


    RBAR is pronounced "ree-bar" and is a "Modenism" for Row-By-Agonizing-Row.
    First step towards the paradigm shift of writing Set Based code:
    ________Stop thinking about what you want to do to a ROW... think, instead, of what you want to do to a COLUMN.

    Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.


    Helpful Links:
    How to post code problems
    How to Post Performance Problems
    Create a Tally Function (fnTally)

  • Thank you. But thing is not sure how to handle other two scenarios
    1. if amtperact <min_cst of lowest seqnum, then UnitPrice should be updated with min_cst of lowest of seqnum(1) always.
    2. if amtperact >max_cst of highest seqnum, then UnitPrice should be updated with max_cst of highest  seqnum(it varies) 

    sample data
    ('Sub013','act1004',72,74,77,1.7,1,'prd2'),
    ('Sub014','act1004',72,77,78,1.8,2,'prd2')
    ('Sub013','act1004',72,78,79,1.9,3,'prd2'),
    ('Sub014','act1004',72,80,85,2.1,4,'prd2')

    Then it should pick 1.7 from seqnum as 72 less than 74 lowest min_cst

    ('Sub015','act1004',87,74,77,1.7,1,'prd2'),
    ('Sub016','act1004',87,77,78,1.8,2,'prd2')
    ('Sub017','act1004',87,78,79,1.9,3,'prd2'),
    ('Sub018','act1004',87,80,82,2.1,4,'prd2')

    Then unitprice should be updated as 2.1 as 87 is greater than 82(max_cst of highest seqnum(4)).

    Please help me

  • saptek9 - Saturday, September 1, 2018 2:58 PM

    Thank you. But thing is not sure how to handle other two scenarios
    1. if amtperact <min_cst of lowest seqnum, then UnitPrice should be updated with min_cst of lowest of seqnum(1) always.
    2. if amtperact >max_cst of highest seqnum, then UnitPrice should be updated with max_cst of highest  seqnum(it varies) 

    sample data
    ('Sub013','act1004',72,74,77,1.7,1,'prd2'),
    ('Sub014','act1004',72,77,78,1.8,2,'prd2')
    ('Sub013','act1004',72,78,79,1.9,3,'prd2'),
    ('Sub014','act1004',72,80,85,2.1,4,'prd2')

    Then it should pick 1.7 from seqnum as 72 less than 74 lowest min_cst

    ('Sub015','act1004',87,74,77,1.7,1,'prd2'),
    ('Sub016','act1004',87,77,78,1.8,2,'prd2')
    ('Sub017','act1004',87,78,79,1.9,3,'prd2'),
    ('Sub018','act1004',87,80,82,2.1,4,'prd2')

    Then unitprice should be updated as 2.1 as 87 is greater than 82(max_cst of highest seqnum(4)).

    Please help me

    You seem to have ignored Jeff's request.

    The absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.
    Martin Rees

    You can lead a horse to water, but a pencil must be lead.
    Stan Laurel

  • Sorry. I forgot to attach sample data file. Please advise the steps to do following scenarios:

    1. if amtperact <min_cst of lowest seqnum, then UnitPrice should be updated with min_cst of lowest of seqnum(1) always.
    2. if amtperact >max_cst of highest seqnum, then UnitPrice should be updated with max_cst of highest seqnum(it varies) 

    sample data
    ('Sub013','act1004',72,74,77,1.7,1,'prd2'),
    ('Sub014','act1004',72,77,78,1.8,2,'prd2')
    ('Sub013','act1004',72,78,79,1.9,3,'prd2'),
    ('Sub014','act1004',72,80,85,2.1,4,'prd2')

    Then it should pick 1.7 from seqnum as 72 less than 74 lowest min_cst

    ('Sub015','act1004',87,74,77,1.7,1,'prd2'),
    ('Sub016','act1004',87,77,78,1.8,2,'prd2')
    ('Sub017','act1004',87,78,79,1.9,3,'prd2'),
    ('Sub018','act1004',87,80,82,2.1,4,'prd2')

    Then unitprice should be updated as 2.1 as 87 is greater than 82(max_cst of highest seqnum(4)).

    Please help me

  • I can only presume you chose to NOT read Jeff's signature links and put the data in "readily consumable" form.   That is NOT a spreadsheet, as many are unwilling to trust spreadsheets coming from the internet.   When you supply the CREATE TABLE and INSERT statements for the sample data within a SQL Code block, it will be MUCH easier for folks to copy and paste into SSMS (or similar tools).   Having to trust a spreadsheet entails unnecessary risk and additional effort, which is also in the unnecessary category....

    Steve (aka sgmunson) 🙂 🙂 🙂
    Rent Servers for Income (picks and shovels strategy)

Viewing 7 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply