February 28, 2011 at 9:20 pm
Comments posted to this topic are about the item MVP Summit 2011
March 1, 2011 at 8:12 am
There is a strong need, from my point of view, for a better method to scale out SQL Server. Specifically, I am looking for a better clustered SQL Server. One where we can have multiple servers accessing the same database. Something along the lines of Oracle. Or maybe a better documented way to use replication and clustering. Hmm.. has anyone done merge replication and clusters?
Raymond Laubert
Exceptional DBA of 2009 Finalist
MCT, MCDBA, MCITP:SQL 2005 Admin,
MCSE, OCP:10g
March 1, 2011 at 2:01 pm
Here's to hoping that MS will take to heart what the MVPs are saying.
Jason...AKA CirqueDeSQLeil
_______________________________________________
I have given a name to my pain...MCM SQL Server, MVP
SQL RNNR
Posting Performance Based Questions - Gail Shaw[/url]
Learn Extended Events
March 1, 2011 at 5:20 pm
Ray Laubert (3/1/2011)
There is a strong need, from my point of view, for a better method to scale out SQL Server. Specifically, I am looking for a better clustered SQL Server. One where we can have multiple servers accessing the same database. Something along the lines of Oracle. Or maybe a better documented way to use replication and clustering. Hmm.. has anyone done merge replication and clusters?
Have a look at peer-to-peer replication.
Merge is typically for when one of the servers is more important - the publisher. Peer to peer treats all replicas as equal.
All replication works fine with clustering.
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply