March 6, 2012 at 4:22 am
Nils Gustav Stråbø (3/6/2012)
I don't complain about the functionality of that specific view, I'm just being an annoying pedantic 😀 Every QOTD has one.
:laugh:
However, if you were really pedantic, you would have realized that the phrasing of the question is: "Which table/view contains a row ...", not "Which table/view returns a row ...". The WHERE clause only affects what the view returns, not what it (or the underlying table) contains.
(So the true pedantic post would have stated that a view never contains rows, unless it is an indexed view. And it would have included a whiney remark about demanding back the oh so precious points that you were robbed off)
PS: To John Hanrahan - please take this comment as I intended it, as a stab to the annoying pedantic that, indeed, appears to be inevitable on the QotD topics. I did in fact enjoy this question very much, and I think it is an excellent question. I hope to see more questions from you in the future.
March 6, 2012 at 4:47 am
I see that I have failed BIG TIME in my first attempt to be a QOTD whining pedantic :crying:
I promise to never try to be one again...
March 6, 2012 at 5:51 am
Nils Gustav Stråbø (3/6/2012)
I see that I have failed BIG TIME in my first attempt to be a QOTD whining pedantic :crying:I promise to never try to be one again...
That may be a difficult promise to keep .....
March 6, 2012 at 5:57 am
Nils Gustav Stråbø (3/6/2012)
I see that I have failed BIG TIME in my first attempt to be a QOTD whining pedantic :crying:I promise to never try to be one again...
Practice makes perfect!
Wait ... did I just say that?
March 6, 2012 at 6:33 am
Nils,
You put the complaint in before I could.
Thank you.
Bill Soranno
MCP, MCTS, MCITP DBA
Database Administrator
Winona State University
Maxwell 143
"Quality, like Success, is a Journey, not a Destination" - William Soranno '92
March 6, 2012 at 6:49 am
Nils Gustav Stråbø (3/6/2012)
I see that I have failed BIG TIME in my first attempt to be a QOTD whining pedantic :crying:I promise to never try to be one again...
The pedantic was fine, it was the whining that was pathetic 😛
This is also a joke....
honest....
no...
no...
WHACK...
ouch! :pinch:
Far away is close at hand in the images of elsewhere.
Anon.
March 6, 2012 at 8:17 am
Glad you all enjoyed the question. I enjoyed the 'whininess' and 'pendaticness' of some of the responses. It's all good.
At least I got a point today!
John
March 6, 2012 at 10:12 am
John Hanrahan (3/6/2012)
Glad you all enjoyed the question. I enjoyed the 'whininess' and 'pendaticness' of some of the responses. It's all good.At least I got a point today!
John
Kudos to you John for submitting 😀
I was thinking of posting a lousy, incorrect buggy question, to get slated and flamed, just so I would get noticed :w00t:
Far away is close at hand in the images of elsewhere.
Anon.
March 6, 2012 at 11:09 am
Nice question. Reviewed to database mail topic once again in a while.
Thanks
March 6, 2012 at 1:10 pm
This one forced me to go and dig a bit. Thanks, John!
March 6, 2012 at 2:01 pm
David Burrows (3/6/2012)
John Hanrahan (3/6/2012)
Glad you all enjoyed the question. I enjoyed the 'whininess' and 'pendaticness' of some of the responses. It's all good.At least I got a point today!
John
Kudos to you John for submitting 😀
I was thinking of posting a lousy, incorrect buggy question, to get slated and flamed, just so I would get noticed :w00t:
Thanks John, David and Nils for such an entertaining question and discussion.
March 6, 2012 at 2:06 pm
David Burrows (3/6/2012)
John Hanrahan (3/6/2012)
Glad you all enjoyed the question. I enjoyed the 'whininess' and 'pendaticness' of some of the responses. It's all good.At least I got a point today!
John
Kudos to you John for submitting 😀
I was thinking of posting a lousy, incorrect buggy question, to get slated and flamed, just so I would get noticed :w00t:
There's still plenty of room available for future QotD's, you know!
(sharpens knives)
March 6, 2012 at 5:25 pm
Thanks for the QOTD John. I too had to go digging on this one.
March 9, 2012 at 3:58 am
Let's see now: can I do better than Nils? 😛
Well it's a good question, a good explanation, utterly incorrect answer (but Hugo already pointed out that Nils should have said that), I can't whine about not getting the point because I did get it, so where on earth do I go from there? :unsure:
Ah, yes, got it: given the second sentence of the explanation it would perhaps have been useful to include a reference to http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms190630.aspx in addition to the reference given. 😀
Tom
March 14, 2012 at 7:55 pm
Good question. Thanks for submitting.
http://brittcluff.blogspot.com/
Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 30 total)
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply