October 26, 2006 at 7:34 pm
What are peoples' opinions of mounting drives as folders (i.e. mount points) as opposed to assigning drive letters? Anyone encounter any problems?
Not that I expect that anyone would run out of drive letters, but just a thought that popped into my head.
MARCUS. Why dost thou laugh? It fits not with this hour.
TITUS. Why, I have not another tear to shed;
--Titus Andronicus, William Shakespeare
October 27, 2006 at 1:22 am
I would be curious to know how you do these mount points. Is something you do in SQL Server?
In any case, the last time I had to deal with a similar problem was when an ASP page executed a query and had to do a save of the ADO result set to a share which required a user and password to access. I never found a way to access this share without mapping it to a drive using WScript.Network's MapNetworkDrive method. But before doing so, the code would scan all existing mapped network drives to see if it's already mapped, etc. etc.
October 27, 2006 at 1:53 am
...Not that I expect that anyone would run out of drive letters...
- consider a cluster-node with a couple of instances topology driv1-data1 drive2-data2 drive3-log drive4-backup .... You'll run out of driveletters soon enough
- I've mounted the backupvolume in a folder of the logdrive for some of our instances.
Just to keep a reminder, this mounted-directory is named MOUNTED_bu,
so it leaves a trace everywhere it is being used or may be used.
Johan
Learn to play, play to learn !
Dont drive faster than your guardian angel can fly ...
but keeping both feet on the ground wont get you anywhere :w00t:
- How to post Performance Problems
- How to post data/code to get the best help[/url]
- How to prevent a sore throat after hours of presenting ppt
press F1 for solution, press shift+F1 for urgent solution 😀
Need a bit of Powershell? How about this
Who am I ? Sometimes this is me but most of the time this is me
October 29, 2006 at 12:14 pm
Funny you should mention a cluster with multiple instances. That's something I've been tasked with investigating as part of a consolidation project, hence why it popped into my head.
Good point re: naming the folder.
Michael:
No, it's something you do in the OS. In Disk Mgmt, instead of assigning a drive letter to a drive, you can mount it to a folder on an existing drive. So you see an extra folder on your C: drive, say, rather than seeing a D: drive. Note: only works with NTFS. Search for "mounting partitions" in Windows help. Works in Win2K & Win2K3.
MARCUS. Why dost thou laugh? It fits not with this hour.
TITUS. Why, I have not another tear to shed;
--Titus Andronicus, William Shakespeare
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply