August 24, 2015 at 9:56 am
Eric M Russell (8/24/2015)
It seems to me that, even in the event of a catastrophic computer system failure, an airplane should still be functional enough to make an emergency landing under manual control.
Seems that way to me too but there are no longer physical connections between the pilot controls and the control surfaces. They would have to add physical hydraulic servo control overrides directly to the hydraulic systems, which is a point of failure in themselves.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 24, 2015 at 10:08 am
Jeff Moden (8/24/2015)
Eric M Russell (8/24/2015)
It seems to me that, even in the event of a catastrophic computer system failure, an airplane should still be functional enough to make an emergency landing under manual control.Seems that way to me too but there are no longer physical connections between the pilot controls and the control surfaces. They would have to add physical hydraulic servo control overrides directly to the hydraulic systems, which is a point of failure in themselves.
Even if the connection between controls and hydraulics are wired, it should not necessarily have to be software dependent. Jumbo jets predate commercial micro computers. Maybe it's time to take a step back.
"Do not seek to follow in the footsteps of the wise. Instead, seek what they sought." - Matsuo Basho
August 24, 2015 at 10:52 am
Eric M Russell (8/24/2015)
It seems to me that, even in the event of a catastrophic computer system failure, an airplane should still be functional enough to make an emergency landing under manual control.
Boy, I'd hope so.
March 3, 2016 at 1:56 am
Testing of installation is often skipped or, rather, descoped to a level well below proving a deployment.
This is not a good place to be and will not change until management in some form are held responsible.
Gaz
-- Stop your grinnin' and drop your linen...they're everywhere!!!
Viewing 4 posts - 16 through 18 (of 18 total)
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply