April 22, 2014 at 10:56 pm
Comments posted to this topic are about the item Memory-Optimized Table Disk space
April 23, 2014 at 12:25 am
Too easy thanks.
Hope this helps...
Ford Fairlane
Rock and Roll Detective
April 23, 2014 at 1:00 am
Had to do some quick searches to get it right, thanx.
Thanks & Best Regards,
Hany Helmy
SQL Server Database Consultant
April 23, 2014 at 4:28 am
Hany Helmy (4/23/2014)
Had to do some quick searches to get it right, thanx.
+1
April 23, 2014 at 6:42 am
This was removed by the editor as SPAM
April 23, 2014 at 7:08 am
Easy one. Thanks Steve.
April 23, 2014 at 8:28 am
I saw a presentation on this a while back and specifically remembered this. Honestly, I was hoping that it hadn't changed. Thanks for the question. I'm anxious to play with 2014, but I know it's going to be a while.
April 23, 2014 at 9:32 am
I suspect this 2 times is only a rough estimate, as it appears to be directly contradicted by the BOL page Durability for Memory-Optimized Tables which states
BOL
Storage taken by active CFPs (not all CFPs are being updated) can be up to 2 times larger than the size of durable tables in memory
which clearly means three times the storage space may be needed on disc (it's two times larger, not just twice as large), which is confirmed towards the end of the same page by the statement
BOL
It is not uncommon for CFPs to be three times the size of the durable memory-optimized tables in memory.
Tom
April 24, 2014 at 12:00 am
Nice question, thanks.
Need an answer? No, you need a question
My blog at https://sqlkover.com.
MCSE Business Intelligence - Microsoft Data Platform MVP
April 28, 2014 at 6:58 am
easy one.
Viewing 10 posts - 1 through 9 (of 9 total)
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply