April 6, 2015 at 12:55 pm
Eirikur Eiriksson (4/6/2015)
pveilleux (4/6/2015)
Eirikur Eiriksson (4/6/2015)
Was it running before? Just thinking of what could have changed|.
😎
It was not running. The 2005 server is a production server and the 2012 instances (sql101, sql102) are still in development. Me and one other person are the only ones actively using them. The other person is the one who reported the problem. I think she only has access to SQL, not to the server itself, so she wouldn't have changed anything.
Is this a physical box or a VM?
😎
The 2012 boxes are VM, the 2005 are physical.
April 6, 2015 at 1:08 pm
pveilleux (4/6/2015)
Eirikur Eiriksson (4/6/2015)
pveilleux (4/6/2015)
Eirikur Eiriksson (4/6/2015)
Was it running before? Just thinking of what could have changed|.
😎
It was not running. The 2005 server is a production server and the 2012 instances (sql101, sql102) are still in development. Me and one other person are the only ones actively using them. The other person is the one who reported the problem. I think she only has access to SQL, not to the server itself, so she wouldn't have changed anything.
Is this a physical box or a VM?
😎
The 2012 boxes are VM, the 2005 are physical.
Think you should have your network guy ruling out any network issues. If he draws blank then we take it from there.
😎
Viewing 2 posts - 16 through 16 (of 16 total)
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply