Just For Fun: An Impossible Delete

Question

Just For Fun: An Impossible Delete

Viewing 15 posts - 106 through 120 (of 156 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply

RBarryYoung SSC Guru Points: 143329 More actions · Answer 1

Me too. Fair enough.

[font="Times New Roman"]-- RBarryYoung[/font], [font="Times New Roman"] (302)375-0451[/font] blog: MovingSQL.com, Twitter: @RBarryYoung [font="Arial Black"]
Proactive Performance Solutions, Inc. [/font][font="Verdana"] "Performance is our middle name."[/font]

Shaun McGuile SSCarpal Tunnel Points: 4141 More actions · Answer 2

If one were to pose a question along the lines of the teacher's lesson from John's post people would still try to 'do the math, draw the picture and write the poem'.

The point would be lost on certain people as it is already, they still would learn nothing.

It is clear that a number of posters did not understand the question/article and jumped to a conclusion. How do you educate these people?

Should they be ignored or told 'no you are wrong, please read the problem as posted fully and understand it before posting next time'?

--Shaun

Hiding under a desk from SSIS Implemenation Work :crazy:

Jeff Moden SSC Guru Points: 1004280 More actions · Answer 3

I agree they need to be told and I very much appreciate you going to bat on this subject... but folks, especially folks like myself, can and should do it without any caustic edge whatsoever. It's sometimes a hard thing to do especially when you see it day in and day out, both here and at work, but John is correct. If folks like me are gonna do things, we need to do them right. I've seen what happens on other forums when even tiny flames become the rule rather than the exception. I should have left it at "go back and read" instead of rubbing it in later.

Barry was actually NOT out of line... I was the only one that used any inflammatory words or innuendo. He was absolutely correct that it would make for an interesting study.

--Jeff Moden

RBAR is pronounced "ree-bar" and is a "Modenism" for Row-By-Agonizing-Row.
First step towards the paradigm shift of writing Set Based code:
________Stop thinking about what you want to do to a ROW... think, instead, of what you want to do to a COLUMN.

Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.

Helpful Links:
How to post code problems
How to Post Performance Problems
Create a Tally Function (fnTally)

Phil Factor SSC-Insane Points: 20244 More actions · Answer 4

In the spur of the moment, we all occasionally forget that people who post articles, or contribute to forums, are our guests, and therefore deserve courtesy. At the same time, most of us enjoy the spontaneity of the replies, though it can mean the occasional flashes of exasperation, even when directed at us! It is just a matter of getting the balance right. I suspect it is better to err on the side of politeness. It is very easy to unintentionally hurt someone's feelings, and I'd hate to discourage contributions.

Best wishes,
Phil Factor

RBarryYoung SSC Guru Points: 143329 More actions · Answer 5

Well said. All o' youse guys. 🙂

[font="Times New Roman"]-- RBarryYoung[/font], [font="Times New Roman"] (302)375-0451[/font] blog: MovingSQL.com, Twitter: @RBarryYoung [font="Arial Black"]
Proactive Performance Solutions, Inc. [/font][font="Verdana"] "Performance is our middle name."[/font]

honza.mf SSCertifiable Points: 5519 More actions · Answer 6

Phil Factor (8/5/2008)
Surely this is the simplest solution? (be warned of a nasty catch when creating these 'quirky updates'. the order of execution of the update is -variable assignments first then column assignments-both left to right!)

Very nice solution.

I Just prefer little change, it's more readable

[font="Courier New"]--create the sample table

DECLARE @Sample TABLE (TheName VARCHAR(4),Identifier INT, sex VARCHAR(1))

INSERT INTO @Sample (TheName,Identifier,Sex)

SELECT 'ABC', 24, 'M' UNION ALL

SELECT 'ABC', 24,'M' UNION ALL

SELECT 'LMN', 27, 'M' UNION ALL

SELECT 'PQRS', 25, 'F' UNION ALL

SELECT 'XYZ', 24, 'M' UNION ALL

SELECT 'XYZ', 25, 'M'

DECLARE @hash VARCHAR(80), @sex VARCHAR(1)

UPDATE @sample

SET

@sex=CASE WHEN COALESCE(@hash,'')

<>TheName+CONVERT(VARCHAR(5),Identifier)+sex

THEN 'd' ELSE SEX END,

@hash= TheName+CONVERT(VARCHAR(5),Identifier)+sex,

Sex = @sex

DELETE FROM @sample WHERE sex='d'

SELECT * FROM @sample[/font]

See, understand, learn, try, use efficient
© Dr.Plch

parody Say Hey Kid Points: 682 More actions · Answer 7

I haven't read through all 12 pages of post admittedly but don't think this has been suggested...

The rules said no new columns but didn't say anything about altering existing columns, should you not have one with a datatype long enough to accept the following. Or of course you could concatenate it onto the int columns assuming it would not exceed int - the existing datatypes would drive whether you needed to alter the table. So worst case scenario:

DROP TABLE Play

CREATE TABLE Play(TheName VARCHAR(4),Identifier INT, sex VARCHAR(1))

INSERT INTO Play (TheName,Identifier,Sex)

SELECT 'ABC', 24, 'M' UNION ALL

SELECT 'ABC', 24,'M' UNION ALL

SELECT 'LMN', 27, 'M' UNION ALL

SELECT 'PQRS', 25, 'F' UNION ALL

SELECT 'XYZ', 24, 'M' UNION ALL

SELECT 'XYZ', 25, 'M'

ALTER TABLE Play

ALTER COLUMN Sex varchar(20)

UPDATE Play

SET Sex = Sex + convert(char,abs(checksum(newid())))

DELETE a

FROM Play a

WHERE substring(Sex,2,19) =

(SELECT min(substring(Sex,2,19))

FROM Play b

WHERE a.TheName = b.TheName

AND a.Identifier = b.Identifier

AND left(a.sex,1) = left(b.sex,1))

UPDATE Play

SET Sex = left(Sex,1)

ALTER TABLE Play

ALTER COLUMN Sex varchar(1)

hmi SSC Enthusiast Points: 116 More actions · Answer 8

Good brain training but are the restrictions as mentioned realistic? Which company would definitely not want to use a temp table or table variable?

Stephen.Richardson Right there with Babe Points: 758 More actions · Answer 9

-- Create table

CREATE TABLE dbo.xSource (Name VARCHAR(50), Age TINYINT, Sex CHAR(1))

INSERT INTO xSource VALUES ('Stephen', 43, 'M')

INSERT INTO xSource VALUES ('Aron', 18, 'M')

INSERT INTO xSource VALUES ('Sharon', 38, 'F')

INSERT INTO xSource VALUES ('Ira', 24, 'F')

INSERT INTO xSource VALUES ('Joe', 49, 'M')

INSERT INTO xSource VALUES ('John', 30, 'F')

INSERT INTO xSource VALUES ('Eva', 30, 'F')

INSERT INTO xSource VALUES ('GB', 44, 'M')

SELECT Name, Age, Sex FROM xSource ORDER BY Name, Sex, Age

-- Step 1 Get list of only DUPLICATE rows

INSERT INTO xSource (Name, Age, Sex)

SELECT '~'+Name, Age, Sex FROM xSource GROUP BY Name, Age, Sex Having COUNT(*) > 1

-- Part 2 Delete DUPLICATE rows

DELETE xSource

FROM xSource DLT

INNER JOIN (SELECT SUBSTRING(Name, 2, 49) AS Name, Age, Sex FROM xSource WHERE SUBSTRING(Name,1,1)='~') LST

ON DLT.Name = LST.Name

AND DLT.Age = LST.Age

AND DLT.Sex = LST.SEX

-- Step 3 Repopulate Distinct Purged rows

INSERT INTO xSource (Name, Age, Sex)

SELECT Name, Age, Sex

FROM (SELECT SUBSTRING(Name, 2, 49) AS Name, Age, Sex FROM xSource WHERE SUBSTRING(Name,1,1)='~') LST

-- Step 4 Cleanup

DELETE xSource

WHERE SUBSTRING(Name,1,1)='~'

SELECT Name, Age, Sex FROM xSource ORDER BY Name, Sex, Age

OCTom SSChampion Points: 11785 More actions · Answer 10

Thanks for the memories. A time when storage and memory was rare and expensive and you had to really know how the guts of the operating system, disk system, and memory allocation worked. Some of the old techniques are still useful today.

Great article and a great solution. 😎

steve smith-401573 SSChampion Points: 10889 More actions · Answer 11

Stephen.Richardson (10/30/2009)
-- Create table
CREATE TABLE dbo.xSource (Name VARCHAR(50), Age TINYINT, Sex CHAR(1))
INSERT INTO xSource VALUES ('Stephen', 43, 'M')
INSERT INTO xSource VALUES ('Stephen', 43, 'M')
INSERT INTO xSource VALUES ('Stephen', 43, 'M')
INSERT INTO xSource VALUES ('Aron', 18, 'M')
INSERT INTO xSource VALUES ('Sharon', 38, 'F')
INSERT INTO xSource VALUES ('Sharon', 38, 'F')
INSERT INTO xSource VALUES ('Sharon', 38, 'F')
INSERT INTO xSource VALUES ('Sharon', 38, 'F')
INSERT INTO xSource VALUES ('Ira', 24, 'F')
INSERT INTO xSource VALUES ('Joe', 49, 'M')
INSERT INTO xSource VALUES ('Joe', 49, 'M')
INSERT INTO xSource VALUES ('John', 30, 'F')
INSERT INTO xSource VALUES ('John', 30, 'F')
INSERT INTO xSource VALUES ('Eva', 30, 'F')
INSERT INTO xSource VALUES ('GB', 44, 'M')
INSERT INTO xSource VALUES ('GB', 44, 'M')
SELECT Name, Age, Sex FROM xSource ORDER BY Name, Sex, Age
-- Step 1 Get list of only DUPLICATE rows
INSERT INTO xSource (Name, Age, Sex)
SELECT '~'+Name, Age, Sex FROM xSource GROUP BY Name, Age, Sex Having COUNT(*) > 1
-- Part 2 Delete DUPLICATE rows
DELETE xSource
FROM xSource DLT
INNER JOIN (SELECT SUBSTRING(Name, 2, 49) AS Name, Age, Sex FROM xSource WHERE SUBSTRING(Name,1,1)='~') LST
ON DLT.Name = LST.Name
AND DLT.Age = LST.Age
AND DLT.Sex = LST.SEX
-- Step 3 Repopulate Distinct Purged rows
INSERT INTO xSource (Name, Age, Sex)
SELECT Name, Age, Sex
FROM (SELECT SUBSTRING(Name, 2, 49) AS Name, Age, Sex FROM xSource WHERE SUBSTRING(Name,1,1)='~') LST
-- Step 4 Cleanup
DELETE xSource
WHERE SUBSTRING(Name,1,1)='~'
SELECT Name, Age, Sex FROM xSource ORDER BY Name, Sex, Age

Question: Why, in step 3 and 4, do you insert and delete rather than perform an UPDATE xSource Name = SUBSTRING(Name,2,49) WHERE SUBSTRING(Name,1,1)='~'?

Is doing steps 3 and 4 more efficient than the 'replace in place'?

<Caveat: I haven't had my coffee yet, so my coding may be slightly off, but I hope my intent is clear>

JohnG69 Hall of Fame Points: 3114 More actions · Answer 12

Funny how this article just came out today... I was actually on a similar thread last week and someone came up with a great solution...

My personal opinion the article is interesting but ... hmmm...

How about these solutions from this thread...

http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic793765-145-1.aspx

There's an undocumented identity key for every row of any table that can be used... in one simple delete statement you can delete the duplicate rows...

I was amazed...

Check it out.

Thanks

Stephen.Richardson Right there with Babe Points: 758 More actions · Answer 13

The orginal request was to purge the system of "duplicate" rows. Some rows are duplicated and some are not. Additionaly some names lie Terry may be either a male or female therefore you could have a 30 year old Terry male and female therefore not duplicate rows. If you do an update you change all rows matching criteria (I did not try update top 1). Personaly I like security, NO MISTAKES. In production the absolute worst word in the the human lanquage is "oooopppssss", or "I think".

Shaun McGuile SSCarpal Tunnel Points: 4141 More actions · Answer 14

jghali (10/30/2009)
Funny how this article just came out today... I was actually on a similar thread last week and someone came up with a great solution...
My personal opinion the article is interesting but ... hmmm...
How about these solutions from this thread...
http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic793765-145-1.aspx
There's an undocumented identity key for every row of any table that can be used... in one simple delete statement you can delete the duplicate rows...
I was amazed...
Check it out.
Thanks

Please read the thread its not about deleting duplicates its about keeping them 😀

Hiding under a desk from SSIS Implemenation Work :crazy:

isddarms Old Hand Points: 352 More actions · Answer 15

Your off-hand comment about naming the field "Gender" rather than "Sex" piqued my curiosity. Why? As I understand the words, sex means biological differences: chromosomes and sexual organs. Gender refers to the characteristics a society or culture delineates as masculine or feminine. There's some blurring of the definitions, but I think they generally hold. So why do you prefer Gender for the column label?