January 22, 2013 at 6:16 am
Hi geniuses,
I have a table which contains groups inside Receivers and Payers (2 columns).
Some groups can be Receivers and Payers, for instance , A and B.
B, D and E are only payers.
For the receivers we got A, B and C.
For the payers we have A, B, D and E.
Receivers \\ Payers
A \\ A
B \\ A
A \\ B
A \\ D
B \\ D
C \\ A
B \\ E
A \\ E
How do I create a column 'Group' that contains both Receivers and Payers, not repeated?
What i need:
Group
A
B
C
D
E
Thanks, Regards
January 22, 2013 at 6:31 am
SELECT Receivers FROM myTable
UNION
SELECT Payers FROM myTable
____________________________________________________
Deja View - The strange feeling that somewhere, sometime you've optimised this query before
How to get the best help on a forum
http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/Best+Practices/61537January 22, 2013 at 6:55 am
I think this is what you're looking for...
Providing easily consumable sample data makes it easier for people to help and more likely...
--Setup Sample Data
declare @transactions as table (Receivers char(1), Payers char(1))
insert into @transactions(Receivers, Payers)
values('A' , 'A')
,('B' , 'A')
,('A' , 'B')
,('A' , 'D')
,('B' , 'D')
,('C' , 'A')
,('B' , 'E')
,('A' , 'E')
--Actual work statement
select distinct [Group]
from (
select Receivers [Group]
from @transactions
union all
select Payers [Group]
from @transactions
) c
---------------------------------------------------------------
Mike Hahn - MCSomething someday:-)
Right way to ask for help!!
http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/Best+Practices/61537/
I post so I can see my avatar :hehe:
I want a personal webpage 😎
I want to win the lotto 😀
I want a gf like Tiffa :w00t: Oh wait I'm married!:-D
January 22, 2013 at 7:35 am
Thanks Very Much! Helped a lot.
Could you geniuses take a look at this topic:
http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic1409896-391-1.aspx
Thanks again.
Best regards
January 22, 2013 at 8:26 am
It is possible to add a Group By inside each Select?
If yes how do you do it?
Thanks.
January 26, 2013 at 7:23 am
I suspect your definition of 'group by' might be different than mine. Using the sample data in your first post how would the resultset look if it did a "Group By inside each Select"?
There are no special teachers of virtue, because virtue is taught by the whole community.
--Plato
January 27, 2013 at 8:59 pm
Hers's another way.
declare @transactions as table (Receivers char(1), Payers char(1))
insert into @transactions(Receivers, Payers)
values('A' , 'A')
,('B' , 'A')
,('A' , 'B')
,('A' , 'D')
,('B' , 'D')
,('C' , 'A')
,('B' , 'E')
,('A' , 'E')
SELECT RecPyr
FROM @transactions
CROSS APPLY (VALUES (Receivers),(Payers)) a(RecPyr)
GROUP BY RecPyr
Now what did you want to do with a GROUP BY inside of the SELECT?
My thought question: Have you ever been told that your query runs too fast?
My advice:
INDEXing a poor-performing query is like putting sugar on cat food. Yeah, it probably tastes better but are you sure you want to eat it?
The path of least resistance can be a slippery slope. Take care that fixing your fixes of fixes doesn't snowball and end up costing you more than fixing the root cause would have in the first place.
Need to UNPIVOT? Why not CROSS APPLY VALUES instead?[/url]
Since random numbers are too important to be left to chance, let's generate some![/url]
Learn to understand recursive CTEs by example.[/url]
[url url=http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/St
Viewing 7 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply