November 28, 2015 at 2:34 pm
Comments posted to this topic are about the item Join operators, part 2 - limitations
November 29, 2015 at 10:52 pm
This was removed by the editor as SPAM
November 30, 2015 at 5:05 am
Good question.
A title is misleading a bit. If the question is restricted to joins only, then hash join operator will have two inputs really.
November 30, 2015 at 10:46 am
Again, a well-refined questions, thanks Hugo .. I had burned on statement X.:crying:
Residual Predicate is well explained in:
https://www.simple-talk.com/sql/learn-sql-server/showplan-operator-of-the-week---merge-join/
November 30, 2015 at 10:53 am
Nice question, very informative. I got confused and was thinking hash join and not hash match. Oh well. 🙂
December 1, 2015 at 5:19 am
Good question to make me stop and think. Thanks, Hugo.
December 1, 2015 at 5:45 am
Great question, thanks.
Need an answer? No, you need a question
My blog at https://sqlkover.com.
MCSE Business Intelligence - Microsoft Data Platform MVP
December 1, 2015 at 6:37 am
Ed Wagner (12/1/2015)
Good question to make me stop and think. Thanks, Hugo.
December 7, 2015 at 2:49 pm
Thanks for this interesting QOT which proves me that even having spend more than 40 hours to study the operators , I have always a long way up to understand the operators. It is a question I have neglected up to SQL Server 2012 , as I was interested mainly by SMO and T-SQL.
I have reopened an old book ( Inside Microsoft SQL Server 2005 : T-SQL querying ) to see that it was dealing about this topic. I think I will study it and do the same work for the 2008 R2 and 2012 versions before dealing 2014. A long way but I have time enough now.
Viewing 9 posts - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply