Is it possible? - a question about precedence contraint

  • Hello there,

    Is it possible to use precedence contraint to bypass a task? For example, the control flow starts with task A, checks an expression, if true, run B then C, otherwise run C directly.

    A - true -> B

    | false |

    V |

    C<---------

    I have tested this, the job stopped after completing A.

    Any suggestion to make this work?

    Thanks in advance!

  • hl6a (6/7/2011)


    Hello there,

    Is it possible to use precedence contraint to bypass a task? For example, the control flow starts with task A, checks an expression, if true, run B then C, otherwise run C directly.

    A - true -> B

    | false |

    V |

    C<---------

    I have tested this, the job stopped after completing A.

    Any suggestion to make this work?

    Thanks in advance!

    Yes it's possible. You'll need to set a logical OR on the precedence constraints going in to task C.

    If that does not work, please post a screen shot of the control flow.

    The absence of evidence is not evidence of absence
    - Martin Rees
    The absence of consumable DDL, sample data and desired results is, however, evidence of the absence of my response
    - Phil Parkin

  • Thank you for pointing me to the right direction! I just tried your suggestions and it worked as expected. Thanks again!

Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply