Introduction to SQL Server 2005

Question

Introduction to SQL Server 2005

Francis-287537

SSC Rookie

Points: 31
More actions
January 3, 2006 at 9:16 am

#364507

Comments posted to this topic are about the content posted at http://www.sqlservercentral.com/columnists/fFinney/introductiontosqlserver2005.asp

Viewing 10 posts - 1 through 9 (of 9 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply

sheepoo SSC Eights! Points: 959 More actions · Answer 1

Interesting article!

Is it fair to say that the new SQL keywords , like NTile, and RANK, are more geared towards statistical analysis of data, rather than just doing simple database operations(like updates, inserts, deletes)?

Alan Silverblatt Old Hand Points: 327 More actions · Answer 2

The article is very poorly written, and apparently not even proofread.

Yelena Varshal SSC-Dedicated Points: 34286 More actions · Answer 3

Excellent Article with a good overview of develoment features.

I somewhat aggree with Alan too: the examples have typos unless the author did modify his AdventureWorks database.

In the first example in 3.1.1

Select row_number() over (order by SalesOrderDate desc) as RowNum,OrderID, CustomerID, SalesOrderDateFrom Sales.OrderHeaderOrder by SalesOrderDate Desc

Should read:

Select

row_number() over (order by OrderDate desc) as RowNum,

SalesOrderID

, CustomerID, OrderDate

From

Sales.SalesOrderHeader

Order

by OrderDate Desc

In the second example in 3.1.2

State.StateProvinceID

should read

StateProv.StateProvinceID

Since I made a mistake myself trying to point to the mistakes in the second example I guess it is not the author's fault that the names are complex

Regards,Yelena Varsha

sscbm21 Old Hand Points: 323 More actions · Answer 4

Is the MERGE INTO .. there at all in the released version???

I searched the whole Books Online, it's nowhere to be found. Besides I tried executing the example given for this it fails.

bm21

Ian Yates SSCoach Points: 19738 More actions · Answer 5

Thanks for the article.. I don't normally try out the code samples so for me the article was great Didn't know about merge into - will avoid a lot of the if exists(select * from ....) then update... else insert... code in my stored procs!

Bimal Fernando SSCommitted Points: 1945 More actions · Answer 6

Got very frustrated when the examples were not working. MERGE INTO is no longer supported by SQL 2005. Other than that not a bad article.

Jeff Moden SSC Guru Points: 1004343 More actions · Answer 7

Great article! And, I didn't like the Merge Into function anyway...

--Jeff Moden

RBAR is pronounced "ree-bar" and is a "Modenism" for Row-By-Agonizing-Row.
First step towards the paradigm shift of writing Set Based code:
________Stop thinking about what you want to do to a ROW... think, instead, of what you want to do to a COLUMN.

Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.

Helpful Links:
How to post code problems
How to Post Performance Problems
Create a Tally Function (fnTally)

rhunt SSCertifiable Points: 5868 More actions · Answer 8

Just piping in on a something I just noticed in playing with INTERSECTand EXCEPT. I expected that they would act identicle to EXISTS and NOT EXISTS but they don't. They treat nulls differently.

Based on the author's example create a quick reference table.

SELECT

TOP 1000 CustomerID, OrderDate, SalesPersonID

INTO

Sales.SalesOrderHeaderIntersection

FROM

Sales.SalesOrderHeader

I expected the following two queries to return the same results.

SELECT

CustomerID, OrderDate, SalesPersonID FROM Sales.SalesOrderHeader INTERSECT

SELECT

CustomerID, OrderDate, SalesPersonID FROM Sales.SalesOrderHeaderIntersection

SELECT

CustomerID, OrderDate, SalesPersonID FROM Sales.SalesOrderHeader t1

WHERE

EXISTS

(

SELECT * FROM Sales.SalesOrderHeaderIntersection t2 WHERE t1.CustomerID=t2.CustomerID

AND t1.OrderDate=t2.OrderDate AND t1.SalesPersonID=t2.SalesPersonID)

They do not because [NOT] EXISTS ommitts the nulls as a non match while INTERSECT includes them

Raghu Pyapili SSC Enthusiast Points: 119 More actions · Answer 9

Good Article,However would like to see more articles coming with focus on DBA aspects!

Cheers,

Raghu Pyapili