integer lengths (II)

Question

integer lengths (II)

TomThomson

SSC Guru

Points: 104773
More actions
July 4, 2015 at 2:53 pm

#302152

Comments posted to this topic are about the item integer lengths (II)
Tom
July 6, 2015 at 6:16 am

This was removed by the editor as SPAM

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 21 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply

TomThomson SSC Guru Points: 104773 More actions · Answer 1

This question has a serious error. I've asked Steve to correct it. I hope he will award back points to anyone who was caught by the error (only two people so far).

Tom

Carlo Romagnano SSC-Insane Points: 22682 More actions · Answer 2

Correct answer:

When J is between -999,999,999 and -100,000,000 or between 1,000,000,000 and 2,147,483,647

Correct explanation:

...

If the expression is between -999,999,999 and -1(,0)00,000,000 or between 1,000,000,000 and 2,147,483,647 it's decial representation requires exactly 10 didits, so it will just fit into a 10 character string with no paddiing with spaces either side; so the strings STR(J) and cast(J as char(10)) are both the correct decimal representation of J, hence both the same and the expression evaluates to TRUE in this case.

milanmcas Say Hey Kid Points: 671 More actions · Answer 3

Correct answer:

When J is between -999,999,999 and -100,000,000 or between 1,000,000,000 and 2,147,483,647

theviveik Old Hand Points: 368 More actions · Answer 4

Correct answer:

When J is between -999,999,999 and -100,000,000 or between 1,000,000,000 and 2,147,483,647

Koen Verbeeck SSC Guru Points: 259115 More actions · Answer 5

Nice question, thanks.

Need an answer? No, you need a question
My blog at https://sqlkover.com.
MCSE Business Intelligence - Microsoft Data Platform MVP

Koen Verbeeck SSC Guru Points: 259115 More actions · Answer 6

TomThomson (7/4/2015)
This question has a serious error. I've asked Steve to correct it. I hope he will award back points to anyone who was caught by the error (only two people so far).

I missed the error, so I answered the question as intended (and got it right). 😀

Need an answer? No, you need a question
My blog at https://sqlkover.com.
MCSE Business Intelligence - Microsoft Data Platform MVP

paul.knibbs SSCoach Points: 15320 More actions · Answer 7

I totally misunderstood the question--somehow thought it was asking when the CAST would result in TRUE, which it obviously never will. Realised my error when I read the answer. :crying:

Arno Kwetters Hall of Fame Points: 3733 More actions · Answer 8

I also noticed the error but I thought it should be the right answer because there are 2 ranges and only one answer has 2 ranges.

1 range has been described well, the other was just missing one 0.

It is logic :

minus sign with 9 digits

plus is without a sign, so 10 digits

and of course there is the INT limit

Arno Kwetters Hall of Fame Points: 3733 More actions · Answer 9

Good question Tom.

Despite the error, the answer is clear.

In the way the answers has been described,

it was like a one error-correcting answer.

(such as in the digital technique)

Ed Wagner SSC Guru Points: 287026 More actions · Answer 10

I saw that it couldn't have been true for any of the given answers, but understood the point of the question, so I answered with the closest answer and it was right. Another question to make people think - nice one. And at least you found your own error. 😀

Tally Tables - Performance Personified
String Splitting with True Performance
Best practices on how to ask questions

Ken SSCoach Points: 17191 More actions · Answer 11

I presumed there was a typo too and got it right. I still reviewed all of the choices 5 times though before choosing the one that appeared to be the intended correct answer. A well intended question.

Igor Micev SSC-Dedicated Points: 33110 More actions · Answer 12

Good discovery. Thanks.

Igor Micev,My blog: www.igormicev.com

TomThomson SSC Guru Points: 104773 More actions · Answer 13

It seems to be taking a mush longer time that usual to get the question corrected - I mesaged Steve as soon as I saw it (Saturday evening UK time) so thought it would be fixed early Monday (the official publication date); I guess Independence day falling on Saturday is both the reason it was publshed before its official date and the reason it didn't get corrected today.

Tom