October 5, 2011 at 8:47 pm
October 6, 2011 at 12:50 am
Thanks - straight forwards point today
-------------------------------Posting Data Etiquette - Jeff Moden [/url]Smart way to ask a question
There are naive questions, tedious questions, ill-phrased questions, questions put after inadequate self-criticism. But every question is a cry to understand (the world). There is no such thing as a dumb question. ― Carl Sagan
I would never join a club that would allow me as a member - Groucho Marx
October 6, 2011 at 12:58 am
Nice question
Ryan
//All our dreams can come true, if we have the courage to pursue them//
October 6, 2011 at 1:05 am
Nice question, thank you
Iulian
October 6, 2011 at 1:36 am
Nice question compared to yesterday!
October 6, 2011 at 2:55 am
Could you imagine the I/O on a bulk insert to a table with 999 nonclustered indexes though?
I think the DB engine would actually explode.
---
Note to developers:Want to get the best help? Click here https://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/forum-etiquette-how-to-post-datacode-on-a-forum-to-get-the-best-help (Jeff Moden)
My blog: http://uksqldba.blogspot.com
Visit http://www.DerekColley.co.uk to find out more about me.
October 6, 2011 at 4:52 am
Thanks, easy question.
M&M
October 6, 2011 at 5:36 am
This will help the swelling go down after yesterday's injuries. Thanks for the question!
I didn't learn as much as I have with other QOTDs, but sometimes it's nice to see "You got it right!" first thing in the morning. Good way to start the day.
[font="Verdana"]Please don't go. The drones need you. They look up to you.[/font]
Connect to me on LinkedIn
October 6, 2011 at 5:49 am
Needed an easier question after yesterday. Couldn't imagine ever needing 999 indexes on a single table though.
http://brittcluff.blogspot.com/
October 6, 2011 at 5:52 am
nice question!!!!
October 6, 2011 at 7:16 am
Good question, although I rather my ERP developer not know about this limit, it seems they are trying to get there.
October 6, 2011 at 7:49 am
Britt Cluff (10/6/2011)
Needed an easier question after yesterday. Couldn't imagine ever needing 999 indexes on a single table though.
I agree. That seems like a crazy high number.
October 6, 2011 at 8:31 am
nice question... tks.
I'm sure someone out there is quite proud of being able to make full use of this!
Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 27 total)
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply
This website stores cookies on your computer.
These cookies are used to improve your website experience and provide more personalized services to you, both on this website and through other media.
To find out more about the cookies we use, see our Privacy Policy