August 4, 2012 at 11:52 am
Comments posted to this topic are about the item Index types 1
August 5, 2012 at 10:29 pm
Nice question, Got to learn something new 🙂
~ Lokesh Vij
Link to my Blog Post --> www.SQLPathy.com[/url]
Follow me @Twitter
August 5, 2012 at 10:31 pm
thanks for the question;learned about xml indexes .
~ demonfox
___________________________________________________________________
Wondering what I would do next , when I am done with this one :ermm:
August 6, 2012 at 12:39 am
Very nice question Hugo, thanks.
Need an answer? No, you need a question
My blog at https://sqlkover.com.
MCSE Business Intelligence - Microsoft Data Platform MVP
August 6, 2012 at 12:43 am
Great Question Hugo - thanks.
Had to do a lot of reading to check what I already seemed to know, but taught me more about what I didn't know. 🙂
August 6, 2012 at 12:51 am
Good question - makes you think a bit.
Jason...AKA CirqueDeSQLeil
_______________________________________________
I have given a name to my pain...MCM SQL Server, MVP
SQL RNNR
Posting Performance Based Questions - Gail Shaw[/url]
Learn Extended Events
August 6, 2012 at 1:44 am
BrainDonor (8/6/2012)
The detailed disclaimer made me laugh - trying to pre-empt any complaints?
Let's just say that this is not my first QotD submission... :w00t:
By the way, the "please select 3" notice was added by the editor, not me. I only added the "multiple correct answers", but deliberately omitted the number of correct answers, and I am actually a bit disappointed that this number was added. 🙁
August 6, 2012 at 1:51 am
Well that's got the brain ticking over quite nicely now. Thanks Hugo!
August 6, 2012 at 3:18 am
Oof! fluked this one.
Knew the first 2 were right, and that columnstore was non-clustered. Guessed it was probably an XML index and decided "for value" would be more useful.
Phew! 🙂
_____________________________________________________________________
[font="Comic Sans MS"]"The difficult tasks we do immediately, the impossible takes a little longer"[/font]
August 6, 2012 at 3:29 am
This was removed by the editor as SPAM
August 6, 2012 at 5:12 am
Too much for me to handle on Monday morning. Nice question.
August 6, 2012 at 6:19 am
I over thought this one, and knew I was doing it, but still did it anyway. My thinking was that, while you do not have to define a clustered index as unique, SQL Server does add a uniqufier, thus I eliminated non-unique clustered index. See what I mean about over-thinking?
Jack Corbett
Consultant - Straight Path Solutions
Check out these links on how to get faster and more accurate answers:
Forum Etiquette: How to post data/code on a forum to get the best help
Need an Answer? Actually, No ... You Need a Question
August 6, 2012 at 6:25 am
BrainDonor (8/6/2012)
The detailed disclaimer made me laugh - trying to pre-empt any complaints?
I don't blame him. I've decided I'll have to retain an attorney before I do another QotD. 🙂
Thanks, Hugo, for the question. But it was a bit too much for me for a Monday. I don't use non-unique clustered indexes, so I got lost looking for the right answer.
[font="Verdana"]Please don't go. The drones need you. They look up to you.[/font]
Connect to me on LinkedIn
August 6, 2012 at 6:56 am
Thanks for the question Hugo!
I had to research the XML indexes again... not something I use.
Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 29 total)
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply