IN / JOIN / EXISTS giving same performance in a query.

Question

IN / JOIN / EXISTS giving same performance in a query.

T.Ashish

SSCarpal Tunnel

Points: 4248
More actions
July 23, 2014 at 6:22 am

#288876

Hi all,
I have written a query in three different ways using IN, JOIN and EXISTS. As per my knowledge, Exists or Join should have performed better than IN, but in attached example all three queries are performing equally.
Is it a case specific behavior or generally all three performs evenly?
Inner queries are returning 8 and 7 records resp. Total record count is 18258
1. IN
SELECT wkcf.value as person_id
FROM
dbo.worker_custom_field wkcf (nolock)
INNER JOIN
dbo.worker wk (nolock)
ON wkcf.worker_id = wk.worker_id
WHERE wk.buyer_code IN
(SELECT child_company_code FROM dbo.company_link cpl (nolock) WHERE cpl.company_code = 'BACC')
AND wkcf.custom_field_id IN
(SELECT custom_field_id FROM dbo.bacc_person_id_custom_field_temp(nolock))
AND wkcf.value != '' GROUP BY wkcf.value HAVING Count (wk.worker_id) > 1
2. JOIN
SELECT wkcf.value as person_id
FROM dbo.worker wk (nolock)
INNER JOIN dbo.worker_custom_field wkcf (nolock) ON wkcf.worker_id = wk.worker_id
inner join dbo.company_link cpl (nolock) on wk.buyer_code = cpl.child_company_code and cpl.company_code = 'BACC'
inner join dbo.bacc_person_id_custom_field_temp bpicf(nolock) on wkcf.custom_field_id = bpicf.custom_field_id
AND wkcf.value != ''
GROUP BY wkcf.value HAVING Count (wk.worker_id) > 1
3. EXISTS
SELECT wkcf.value as person_id
FROM dbo.worker wk (nolock)
INNER JOIN dbo.worker_custom_field wkcf (nolock) ON wkcf.worker_id = wk.worker_id
WHERE exists
(SELECT child_company_code FROM dbo.company_link cpl (nolock) WHERE cpl.company_code = 'BACC'
and wk.buyer_code = cpl.child_company_code)
AND exists
(SELECT custom_field_id FROM dbo.bacc_person_id_custom_field_temp(nolock) where
wkcf.custom_field_id = custom_field_id
)
AND wkcf.value != '' GROUP BY wkcf.value HAVING Count (wk.worker_id) > 1
Regards.

Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply

ChrisM@Work SSC Guru Points: 186127 More actions · Answer 1

http://sqlinthewild.co.za/index.php/2010/04/27/in-exists-and-join-a-roundup/[/url]

^{“Write the query the simplest way. If through testing it becomes clear that the performance is inadequate, consider alternative query forms.” - Gail Shaw}

For fast, accurate and documented assistance in answering your questions, please read this article.
Understanding and using APPLY, (I) and (II) Paul White
Hidden RBAR: Triangular Joins / The "Numbers" or "Tally" Table: What it is and how it replaces a loop Jeff Moden

Luis Cazares SSC Guru Points: 183706 More actions · Answer 2

Seems like you have some stale statistics on worker_custom_field. Also, why are you using all those NOLOCK hints? Are you aware that you might get incorrect results that include duplicate or missing rows? You could check the following links for more information on this issue:

http://blogs.msdn.com/b/davidlean/archive/2009/04/06/sql-server-nolock-hint-other-poor-ideas.aspx

http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/tonyrogerson/archive/2006/11/10/1280.aspx

http://www.jasonstrate.com/2012/06/the-side-effect-of-nolock/

IN and EXISTS tend to generate a semi-join and that makes them faster than a join. I'm not sure why you are getting normal joins in your plans.

Can you post your test harness? Did you clean the procedure cache before testing?

Luis C.
General Disclaimer:
Are you seriously taking the advice and code from someone from the internet without testing it? Do you at least understand it? Or can it easily kill your server?

How to post data/code on a forum to get the best help: Option 1 / Option 2

Igor Micev SSC-Dedicated Points: 33109 More actions · Answer 3

If you can afford this (means you're not on production environment)

dbcc dropcleanbuffers

dbcc freeproccache

dbcc freesessioncache

set statistics io on

-- One of your query here

set statistics io off

the you can see whether there is really no difference.

Igor Micev,My blog: www.igormicev.com

Gail Shaw SSC Guru Points: 1004504 More actions · Answer 4

ChrisM@Work (7/23/2014)
http://sqlinthewild.co.za/index.php/2010/04/27/in-exists-and-join-a-roundup/[/url]

And the pertinent quote from there is 'very slightly'. The differences between join and in/exists were very slight.

Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability

We walk in the dark places no others will enter
We stand on the bridge and no one may pass