February 21, 2014 at 5:09 am
Well, I am dealing with a vendor that has a table named [NULL], numerous columns named [NULL], and I was completely surprised they didn't just name the database [NULL].
Security by obscurity? This reminds me of the DOS days when at my high school people would hide games inside folders with names of 12 spaces or special characters nested 12 deep.
February 22, 2014 at 1:10 am
SQLRNNR (2/19/2014)
Definitely an interesting question.It makes you think about the difference between a reserved keyword and just a keyword.
+ 1
Thanks & Best Regards,
Hany Helmy
SQL Server Database Consultant
February 22, 2014 at 1:13 am
SQLRNNR (2/20/2014)
Well, I am dealing with a vendor that has a table named [NULL], numerous columns named [NULL], and I was completely surprised they didn't just name the database [NULL].
😀
Thanks & Best Regards,
Hany Helmy
SQL Server Database Consultant
February 24, 2014 at 9:16 am
nice question..
thanks for sharing Andy.
March 1, 2014 at 1:04 am
SQLRNNR (2/19/2014)
Definitely an interesting question.It makes you think about the difference between a reserved keyword and just a keyword.
+1 🙂
March 13, 2014 at 9:29 am
From the Answer - "The database does get set to trustworthy even though the database is read only at that point. It may not be obvious, but the trustworthy setting is stored in master and not in the database " - Nice catch Andy. Thanks for sharing.
Viewing 6 posts - 16 through 20 (of 20 total)
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply