September 26, 2018 at 10:15 pm
Comments posted to this topic are about the item Implicit function overloading
September 26, 2018 at 11:01 pm
Nice, easy question, thanks Erikur
____________________________________________
Space, the final frontier? not any more...
All limits henceforth are self-imposed.
“libera tute vulgaris ex”
September 26, 2018 at 11:25 pm
Hi Eirikur. Regarding this statement: "Functions overloading is not transparent in the SQL Server's implementations and can cause some confusion." (emphasis mine), did you mean to say that it is not transparent, or that it is transparent? I think it should be "is".
Also, regarding the statement of: "The rule of thumb, which is not found in the BOL, is that the input data type directs the overloading", it does state in BOL, including in the documentation for REPLICATE that you linked to in the answer, which states:
Similar wording can be found in the documentation for:
Take care, Solomon..
SQL# — https://SQLsharp.com/ ( SQLCLR library ofover 340 Functions and Procedures)
Sql Quantum Lift — https://SqlQuantumLift.com/ ( company )
Sql Quantum Leap — https://SqlQuantumLeap.com/ ( blog )
Info sites — Collations • Module Signing • SQLCLR
September 27, 2018 at 2:04 am
Nice simple question
Ta
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The more you know, the more you know that you dont know
September 27, 2018 at 2:52 am
Solomon Rutzky - Wednesday, September 26, 2018 11:25 PMHi Eirikur. Regarding this statement: "Functions overloading is not transparent in the SQL Server's implementations and can cause some confusion." (emphasis mine), did you mean to say that it is not transparent, or that it is transparent? I think it should be "is".Also, regarding the statement of: "The rule of thumb, which is not found in the BOL, is that the input data type directs the overloading", it does state in BOL, including in the documentation for REPLICATE that you linked to in the answer, which states:
- SUBSTRING
- TRANSLATE
- REPLACE (this one even has the same note about truncation to 8000 bytes occurring when not passing in a MAX type)
For a related discussion, please see the following thread: Creating Strings with ReplicateTake care, Solomon..
You are right Solomon, I meant to say that it is transparent.
😎
September 27, 2018 at 1:53 pm
Very smart. Thank you, Eirikur!
Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply