Implicit function overloading

Question

Implicit function overloading

Eirikur Eiriksson

SSC Guru

Points: 182911
More actions
September 26, 2018 at 10:15 pm

#415737

Comments posted to this topic are about the item Implicit function overloading

Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply

Stewart "Arturius" Campbell SSC Guru Points: 72624 More actions · Answer 1

Nice, easy question, thanks Erikur

____________________________________________
Space, the final frontier? not any more...
All limits henceforth are self-imposed.
“libera tute vulgaris ex”

Solomon Rutzky SSCoach Points: 16430 More actions · Answer 2

Hi Eirikur. Regarding this statement: "Functions overloading is not transparent in the SQL Server's implementations and can cause some confusion." (emphasis mine), did you mean to say that it is not transparent, or that it is transparent? I think it should be "is".

Also, regarding the statement of: "The rule of thumb, which is not found in the BOL, is that the input data type directs the overloading", it does state in BOL, including in the documentation for REPLICATE that you linked to in the answer, which states:

Return Types
Returns the same type as string_expression.

Similar wording can be found in the documentation for:

SUBSTRING
TRANSLATE
REPLACE (this one even has the same note about truncation to 8000 bytes occurring when not passing in a MAX type)

Overloading is also used sometimes via number of parameters. Several functions have optional parameters, such as:

For a related discussion, please see the following thread: Creating Strings with Replicate

Take care, Solomon..

SQL# — https://SQLsharp.com/ ( SQLCLR library ofover 340 Functions and Procedures)
Sql Quantum Lift — https://SqlQuantumLift.com/ ( company )
Sql Quantum Leap — https://SqlQuantumLeap.com/ ( blog )
Info sites — Collations • Module Signing • SQLCLR

Shayn Thomas SSCertifiable Points: 5863 More actions · Answer 3

Nice simple question
Ta

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The more you know, the more you know that you dont know

Eirikur Eiriksson SSC Guru Points: 182911 More actions · Answer 4

Solomon Rutzky - Wednesday, September 26, 2018 11:25 PM
Hi Eirikur. Regarding this statement: "Functions overloading is not transparent in the SQL Server's implementations and can cause some confusion." (emphasis mine), did you mean to say that it is not transparent, or that it is transparent? I think it should be "is".
Also, regarding the statement of: "The rule of thumb, which is not found in the BOL, is that the input data type directs the overloading", it does state in BOL, including in the documentation for REPLICATE that you linked to in the answer, which states:
Return Types
Returns the same type as string_expression.
SUBSTRING
TRANSLATE
REPLACE (this one even has the same note about truncation to 8000 bytes occurring when not passing in a MAX type)
CHARINDEX
FORMAT
QUOTENAME
OBJECT_NAME
OBJECT_SCHEMA_NAME
CONVERT
For a related discussion, please see the following thread: Creating Strings with Replicate
Take care, Solomon..

You are right Solomon, I meant to say that it is transparent.
😎

Revenant SSC-Forever Points: 42467 More actions · Answer 5

Revenant

SSC-Forever

Points: 42467

September 27, 2018 at 1:53 pm

#2007306

Very smart. Thank you, Eirikur!