how to use a column name in argument of top() ?

  • Hi,

    I have been receiving below error when i use top(p.nid) in my select.

    error:

    The reference to column "nid" is not allowed in the argument of the TOP clause. Only references to columns at an outer scope or standalone expressions and subqueries are allowed here.

    BTW my argument to top() is stored in a table and i need to use that.

    tbltop

    -------------

    idnid

    12

    23

    tbldata

    -------------

    iddata

    1a

    1b

    1c

    1d

    1e

    1f

    1g

    1h

    2a

    2b

    2c

    2d

    2e

    i used this query but it fails.

    select top(t.nid) d.data from tbldata d inner join tbltop t on t.id=d.id

  • descentflower (6/18/2009)


    Hi,

    I have been receiving below error when i use top(p.nid) in my select.

    error:

    The reference to column "nid" is not allowed in the argument of the TOP clause. Only references to columns at an outer scope or standalone expressions and subqueries are allowed here.

    BTW my argument to top() is stored in a table and i need to use that.

    tbltop

    -------------

    idnid

    12

    23

    tbldata

    -------------

    iddata

    1a

    1b

    1c

    1d

    1e

    1f

    1g

    1h

    2a

    2b

    2c

    2d

    2e

    i used this query but it fails.

    select top(t.nid) d.data from tbldata d inner join tbltop t on t.id=d.id

    top requires an integer to be passed.

    top 1 gives the first record based on ur query.

    you might want to use max in this case

    select max(t.nid) d.data from tbldata d inner join tbltop t on t.id=d.id

    group by d.data



    Pradeep Singh

  • Hi,

    What output are you looking for? TOP is not a function you can use on a join. As Pradeep says, you can use MAX() but then again, it depends on what the output it is that you require.

    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Struggling to find the question?
    http://weblogs.sqlteam.com/jeffs/archive/2008/05/13/question-needed-not-answer.aspx

  • Hi,

    i need output in this form,

    iddata

    1a

    1b

    2a

    2b

    2c

    top(2) for id=1

    top(3) for id=2

  • descentflower (6/18/2009)


    Hi,

    top(2) for id=1

    top(3) for id=2

    still unclear what u need!!

    can u post sample data in each tables and expected output.



    Pradeep Singh

  • Assuming 2005 +

    with ctedata(id,data,rownum)

    as

    (

    Select id,data,row_number() over (partition by id order by data)

    from tblData

    )

    select cteData.id,cteData.data

    from cteData,

    tbltop

    where cteData.id = tbltop.id

    and rownum <=tbltop.nid



    Clear Sky SQL
    My Blog[/url]

  • You can use order by clause with top in select like

    select top(2) * from Table order by Id

  • Hi all,

    here is sample data.

    tbltop

    -------------

    idnid

    1 2

    2 3

    tbldata

    -------------

    id data

    1 a

    1 b

    1 c

    1 d

    1 e

    1 f

    1 g

    1 h

    2 a

    2 b

    2 c

    2 d

    2 e

    i need top x rows from table tbldata for each id in tabletop.

    Value of x is stored in table tbltop.

    Expected output

    ---------------

    iddata

    1a

    1b

    2a

    2b

    3c

  • Did you try my suggestion ?

    It gives you that...



    Clear Sky SQL
    My Blog[/url]

  • Dave Ballantyne (6/18/2009)


    Did you try my suggestion ?

    It gives you that...

    :w00t:Hi,Dave Thanks it works as expected by me !! :w00t:

    PS have u understood my problem?

    Thanks again dave

  • Ah. I see.

    This should do the trick, I think:

    -- This table specifies how many rows to return for each row_id in the data table

    DECLARE@Top TABLE (row_id INT NOT NULL, top_count INT NOT NULL);

    -- The data table. The seq_id column is there to provide a basis for choosing the TOP (n) rows

    DECLARE@data TABLE (seq_id INT IDENTITY, row_id INT NOT NULL, data CHAR(1) NOT NULL);

    -- Sample top row specifications

    -- Three rows for row_id 1, two for row_id 2, and one for row_id 3

    INSERT@Top (row_id, top_count)

    SELECT1, 3 UNION ALL

    SELECT2, 2 UNION ALL

    SELECT3, 1;

    -- Data to choose from

    -- Assumes data will be inserted in the listed order

    INSERT@data (row_id, data)

    SELECT1, 'a' UNION ALL

    SELECT1, 'b' UNION ALL

    SELECT1, 'c' UNION ALL

    SELECT1, 'd' UNION ALL

    SELECT1, 'e' UNION ALL

    SELECT1, 'f' UNION ALL

    SELECT2, 'A' UNION ALL

    SELECT2, 'B' UNION ALL

    SELECT2, 'C' UNION ALL

    SELECT3, 'Z' UNION ALL

    SELECT3, 'Y';

    -- The final select

    SELECTT.row_id, CA.data

    FROM@Top AS T

    CROSS

    APPLY(

    -- This is run for every row selected from T in the outer query

    -- Since T is an outer reference, we can use a column from it for the TOP

    SELECTTOP (T.top_count)

    D.Data

    FROM@data AS D

    WHERED.row_id = T.row_id

    ORDERBY

    D.seq_id

    ) AS CA;

    Output:

    [font="Courier New"]row_id, data

    1a

    1b

    1c

    2A

    2B

    3Z

    [/font]

    Paul

  • PS have u understood my problem?

    I believe so , but i would encourage , and expect, you to understand the code and to ensure that the given solution works under all your expected circumstances.

    I wont be the one who will be getting a midnight call if it doesnt work as expected and your company is losing money, that'll be you.



    Clear Sky SQL
    My Blog[/url]

  • Dave Ballantyne (6/18/2009)


    PS have u understood my problem?

    I believe so , but i would encourage , and expect, you to understand the code and to ensure that the given solution works under all your expected circumstances.

    I wont be the one who will be getting a midnight call if it doesnt work as expected and your company is losing money, that'll be you.

    Sure.

  • Paul White (6/18/2009)


    Ah. I see.

    This should do the trick, I think:

    -- This table specifies how many rows to return for each row_id in the data table

    DECLARE@Top TABLE (row_id INT NOT NULL, top_count INT NOT NULL);

    -- The data table. The seq_id column is there to provide a basis for choosing the TOP (n) rows

    DECLARE@data TABLE (seq_id INT IDENTITY, row_id INT NOT NULL, data CHAR(1) NOT NULL);

    -- Sample top row specifications

    -- Three rows for row_id 1, two for row_id 2, and one for row_id 3

    INSERT@Top (row_id, top_count)

    SELECT1, 3 UNION ALL

    SELECT2, 2 UNION ALL

    SELECT3, 1;

    -- Data to choose from

    -- Assumes data will be inserted in the listed order

    INSERT@data (row_id, data)

    SELECT1, 'a' UNION ALL

    SELECT1, 'b' UNION ALL

    SELECT1, 'c' UNION ALL

    SELECT1, 'd' UNION ALL

    SELECT1, 'e' UNION ALL

    SELECT1, 'f' UNION ALL

    SELECT2, 'A' UNION ALL

    SELECT2, 'B' UNION ALL

    SELECT2, 'C' UNION ALL

    SELECT3, 'Z' UNION ALL

    SELECT3, 'Y';

    -- The final select

    SELECTT.row_id, CA.data

    FROM@Top AS T

    CROSS

    APPLY(

    -- This is run for every row selected from T in the outer query

    -- Since T is an outer reference, we can use a column from it for the TOP

    SELECTTOP (T.top_count)

    D.Data

    FROM@data AS D

    WHERED.row_id = T.row_id

    ORDERBY

    D.seq_id

    ) AS CA;

    Output:

    [font="Courier New"]row_id, data

    1a

    1b

    1c

    2A

    2B

    3Z

    [/font]

    Paul

    Thanks Paul , this gave me the expected result. But i need to test under different situations.

    Which one will be better ? a cross apply or with cte ? i donno what cross apply does.

  • This is the Books Online link: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms175156(SQL.90).aspx

    This is an article on this site: http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/T-SQL/63115/

    The APPLY solution should generally slightly out-perform the CTE (although the plans are pretty similar).

    The main difference is that the APPLY uses a TOP operator directly, whereas the CTE uses the ROW_NUMBER window function and an inequality to do the same job. The ROW_NUMBER may also require a sort before the segment and sequence project to get the rows into order, unless an appropriately sorted index is available and selected by the optimizer.

    The main reason I provided the APPLY solution was because your original question specifically asked how to use a column with the TOP operator 🙂

    Paul

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 15 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply