February 3, 2009 at 9:20 am
Hi all,
This might not be a right palce to ask this question. but it is convenient to login here plus a lot of gurus.
I have a MSA1500 CS controller and one SCSI array connecting to it. this physical array has 10 disks.
I need to build a SQL Server 2005 clustering enviroment on this Array.
Which way is the best for SQL Server Performance, my application is more heavy read.
1. Quorum/Raid 1/2 disks/logical drive Q
Log Files/Raid 1/ 2 disks / Logical Drive M
Data Files/ Raid 5/5 Disk / Logical Drive L
one disk as global hot spare
2. build one Raid 5 on 9 disks. then create 3 logical drives for Quorum/log/data
Thanks
February 3, 2009 at 9:24 am
Option 1 is superior - well anyway that's how mine is set up!
j
February 3, 2009 at 2:10 pm
Option 1 is better than option 2.
However, since you mentioned that you are talking about a read-intensive system, have you considered RAID 1 for the data files?
RAID 1 has, I believe, the fastest response time to a read request. The downside is of course the fact that you need to basically buy twice as many disks.
Just a thought.
February 3, 2009 at 2:39 pm
thanks for reply.
But in this link, It said, one array, one logical drives has high performance. I am so confused.
An issue has been identified on the MSA1000, MSA1500 and MSA1510i arrays where degraded read performance has been observed when multiple logical drives (LUNs) are configured to a single array group. The degraded read performance occurs during heavy write utilization of a LUN and simultaneous read access of another LUN on the same array group.
February 5, 2009 at 4:01 am
Sorry, can't follow the link.
Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply