November 1, 2011 at 12:30 pm
I guess I haven't learned how to separate my comment from the piece I was responding to. The first line only was from the original poster.
I suspect there may be some implicit starting number (maybe it's just a one) that then gets multipled or divided by the numbers from the channels.
But since I am not the original poster on this, I don't know the proper sequence, nor do I know the statistical relevance. From the look of it, I don't think it is statistical analysis at all. It looks more like monitoring an industrial process or something like that.
Anyway, unless we hear back from strawb3, there's probably nothing more to be done here.
November 1, 2011 at 12:32 pm
mthurber (11/1/2011)
I guess I haven't learned how to separate my comment from the piece I was responding to. The first line only was from the original poster.I suspect there may be some implicit starting number (maybe it's just a one) that then gets multipled or divided by the numbers from the channels.
But since I am not the original poster on this, I don't know the proper sequence, nor do I know the statistical relevance. From the look of it, I don't think it is statistical analysis at all. It looks more like monitoring an industrial process or something like that.
Anyway, unless we hear back from strawb3, there's probably nothing more to be done here.
Ha! My bad... Obviously my post was for the OP. Sorry!
Jared
Jared
CE - Microsoft
Viewing 2 posts - 16 through 16 (of 16 total)
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply