March 3, 2016 at 8:28 pm
Comments posted to this topic are about the item How many peers?
March 3, 2016 at 10:22 pm
This was removed by the editor as SPAM
March 4, 2016 at 2:41 am
I make 92m. Bigint 2^63-1 (9,223,372,036,854,775,807) / 100,000,000 = 92,233,720.36854775.
How do we get 92billion? Am I missing something?
March 4, 2016 at 2:46 am
Ok so don't use windows calculator to try to calculate this. I can now see my mistake.
Good question, poor calculator skills.
March 4, 2016 at 2:48 am
Good question, thanks
...
March 4, 2016 at 6:39 am
Too many zeros!
The referenced post about running out of bigints is interesting - a comment to that post suggests it's possible in some environments - I want to try that!
March 4, 2016 at 7:12 am
I got it right by pure luck. I haven't yet had my first cup of coffee so I was too lazy to do the math. I was really hoping for the "more than you would ever possibly need" answer but after a short perusing of the options it wasn't there. Good question Steve.
_______________________________________________________________
Need help? Help us help you.
Read the article at http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/Best+Practices/61537/ for best practices on asking questions.
Need to split a string? Try Jeff Modens splitter http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/Tally+Table/72993/.
Cross Tabs and Pivots, Part 1 – Converting Rows to Columns - http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/T-SQL/63681/
Cross Tabs and Pivots, Part 2 - Dynamic Cross Tabs - http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/Crosstab/65048/
Understanding and Using APPLY (Part 1) - http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/APPLY/69953/
Understanding and Using APPLY (Part 2) - http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/APPLY/69954/
March 4, 2016 at 7:19 am
TimCarrett (3/4/2016)
Ok so don't use windows calculator to try to calculate this. I can now see my mistake.Good question, poor calculator skills.
Hey, I used the Windows calculator. The beep indicated that something went wrong and I found I was missing 3 digits, so I just missed 3 digits from the range.
I had the advantage of having my coffee first.
March 4, 2016 at 7:19 am
TimCarrett (3/4/2016)
Ok so don't use windows calculator to try to calculate this. I can now see my mistake.Good question, poor calculator skills.
Worked OK for me after switching to View / Scientific
March 4, 2016 at 8:12 am
Total guess, but got the point!
March 4, 2016 at 8:44 am
Why not start it at max negative and use the negative side as well? Then you would have almost twice as many...
March 4, 2016 at 9:03 am
TimCarrett (3/4/2016)
Ok so don't use windows calculator to try to calculate this. I can now see my mistake.Good question, poor calculator skills.
I think I did that a few times writing this question.
March 4, 2016 at 9:03 am
paul s-306273 (3/4/2016)
Total guess, but got the point!
Good. That was the intention
March 4, 2016 at 9:04 am
emiddlebrooks (3/4/2016)
Why not start it at max negative and use the negative side as well? Then you would have almost twice as many...
You could do that, and some do. I find negative numbers problematic for humans when working with data and joins for troubleshooting or other work.
My point was with a BIGINT, I'm not sure you need to do this.
March 4, 2016 at 9:09 am
Steve Jones - SSC Editor (3/4/2016)
paul s-306273 (3/4/2016)
Total guess, but got the point!Good. That was the intention
... even better then.
Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 22 total)
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply
This website stores cookies on your computer.
These cookies are used to improve your website experience and provide more personalized services to you, both on this website and through other media.
To find out more about the cookies we use, see our Privacy Policy