April 3, 2014 at 12:15 pm
Hello DBA's
just wondering who is managing maximum number of Databases?
PLEASE REPLY
Thank You
April 3, 2014 at 12:23 pm
Why?
April 3, 2014 at 12:37 pm
Number of databases does not matter. At my last place I had just one database with size > 2.5 TB. At my present place I have about 20-30 databases , but the largest is less than 300 GB. Their combined size is 6 TB +. And you always can consolidate/split databases.
What I think does matter is combined size of all db's and number of production servers.
April 3, 2014 at 12:46 pm
Thank You i am accidental DBA trying to understand how many Databases a DBA manages normally...
April 3, 2014 at 1:09 pm
FWIW, I managed 4500 servers at a previous job with over 10,000 databases.
I recently managed over 200 servers for various clients with total DB size over 50TB.
It all kind of depends on what is needed at the moment as to how many databases and database size that I manage.
Jason...AKA CirqueDeSQLeil
_______________________________________________
I have given a name to my pain...MCM SQL Server, MVP
SQL RNNR
Posting Performance Based Questions - Gail Shaw[/url]
Learn Extended Events
April 3, 2014 at 2:41 pm
How about 190 DB Servers, 218 SQL Instances, 3869 Databases and 57.9 TB of DB Storage (Today).
April 3, 2014 at 3:48 pm
jrp12 (4/3/2014)
Hello DBA'sjust wondering who is managing maximum number of Databases?
PLEASE REPLY
Thank You
what is your definition of "managing".....??
________________________________________________________________
you can lead a user to data....but you cannot make them think
and remember....every day is a school day
April 3, 2014 at 6:00 pm
My 70+ severs and 800+ databases doesn't seem as bad now, even if it is only me, some servers over 15 years old and I still don't believe I know about all of them (in my defence, pulling together an estate built up totally randomly over 15 years before I got there with no SQL Server DBA).
I'm a DBA.
I'm not paid to solve problems. I'm paid to prevent them.
April 3, 2014 at 8:40 pm
I manage 21 servers with about 12 DB's per server, total size is about 11TB (with 2 servers accounting for 9TB of that total amount)
Good Lord Jason :w00t: HOW ON EARTH DID YOU MANAGE TO DO THAT???
______________________________________________________________________________Never argue with an idiot; Theyll drag you down to their level and beat you with experience
April 4, 2014 at 3:54 am
It purely depends on the customer requirement. We can't create more database and put more data to manage. Instead of finding howmany DB supports try to understand environment of the customer and how you can handel it; will help more.
It depends on many factors like:
Monitoring tool
howmuch automation
load on the server
criticality of the database
availability of the database
HTH
---------------------------------------------------
"Thare are only 10 types of people in the world:
Those who understand binary, and those who don't."
April 4, 2014 at 7:43 am
MyDoggieJessie (4/3/2014)
I manage 21 servers with about 12 DB's per server, total size is about 11TB (with 2 servers accounting for 9TB of that total amount)Good Lord Jason :w00t: HOW ON EARTH DID YOU MANAGE TO DO THAT???
Let's just say, I don't think I would try it again :hehe:
Jason...AKA CirqueDeSQLeil
_______________________________________________
I have given a name to my pain...MCM SQL Server, MVP
SQL RNNR
Posting Performance Based Questions - Gail Shaw[/url]
Learn Extended Events
April 4, 2014 at 7:46 am
Continuing on a theme here, not all databases are equal, so comparing the number of managed databases is a faulty metric. Managing 100 databases that support (well developed) third party applications can be easier and less work than supporint two databases that support in-house applications that are constantly in flux.
April 4, 2014 at 1:27 pm
Thank You all
it really helped me to understand how really people/DBA's are thinking.
I am learning SQL and working on MCTS 70-432 Exam and really could not understand what is work look like.
THANK YOU ALL
April 5, 2014 at 6:59 am
Dear Friend,
No of DBs, Servers and database size always depends on the environment you are working. There is no fix size of databases or servers.
One DBA can manage one server and 100s of servers too. Depending how stable your environment is and how you setup the monitoring into them (automatic or manual etc).
There are lots of replies above so your concern should be clear now.
April 5, 2014 at 3:08 pm
I have found that managing databases and servers is pretty easy although I certainly prefer not to have to keep up with hunred or thosands like some of the folks on this thread.
What I have found is that the more users that are allowed to write their own queries and the more developers that are allowed to promote their own code, the more troublesome that particular database/server is going to be. If there's no QA and no code review process in place, you can generally multiply that problem by a factor of 10. 😉
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 14 (of 14 total)
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply