Post reply

Hosting Providers

  • June 13, 2006 at 4:26 pm

    #94049

    Ok, we're looking into migrating hosting providers soon and exploring some options.

    This is a fairly large installation, with 8 servers, a load balancer, firewall, and SAN. Bandwidth is about 4TB/month. We are looking for something in the $15,000 per month range. Location doesn't matter, tho if we had a choice, Washington D.C. / Dulles, VA area is preferred.

    I want your feedback on personal experience (both good and bad) for hosting providers.

    Thanks!

  • June 14, 2006 at 9:53 am

    #643696

    The best bet I have found is to post the same post over @ http://www.webhostingtalk.com. Im quite sure you will recieve some hits there that you are looking for

  • June 14, 2006 at 9:54 am

    #643700

    Thanks Shannara : >

  • June 14, 2006 at 11:06 am

    #643738

    Shoot a private mail to Steve Jones. The SSC.com provider I don't believe is in the DC area, but you can get his experiences.

    K. Brian Kelley
    @kbriankelley

  • June 14, 2006 at 3:44 pm

    #643814

    Thx Brian, will do.

    For the rest of you out there, here are a few more details regarding our managed hosting requirements:

    The web apps are based on .Net 2.0 (Windows Server 2003) with a SQL Server 2005 database backend. An Active Directory domain is also a requirement. We also have some reporting tools that will be accessed by users from HQ. A high speed VPN connection is a necessity.

    As for the hardware, there will be some sort of clustering for the database servers be it an MSFT hardware cluster or a SQL Server 2005 mirroring (which is similar to a software based clustering). I assume most managed host providers offer a SAN installation. Right now this is a requirement for our SQL database enviroment (live and data warehouse db's) as hosting the database on fixed disk is not the current config.

    The web servers will be load balanced but likely not clustered (these are issues still in planning). In general, we'll need 2 or 3 64-bit boxes and the rest 32-bit. We're not sure if they'll be AMD or Intel (I assume the provider could provide both options - we're opened to suggestions).

    Thanks again.

  • June 14, 2006 at 4:02 pm

    #643817

    Charcoll,

    If you're looking for 8+ servers, I'd look at a complete rack in a colocation facility with you providing the equipment. you can purchase what you want and upgrade when needed. Most of the hosting companies I've worked with in the last couple years will provide load balancing, managed backup, etc. for a fee. However "renting" 8+ servers is likely to be very expensive for what you get.

    What's the bandwidth use on a 95% range? 4TB a month can be 5Mbps sustained or much more in peak. We've got a great deal for 5Mbps for SQLServerCentral at a couple thousand. Even factoring in a lease of equipment, I doubt we'd break 6-7k. The managed services aren't that bad.

    We use Viawest, out here in CO, CA, UT, but Sungard has some nice services as well. Might check with them.

  • June 15, 2006 at 5:42 pm

    #644097

    Check Egenera blade technology servers(http://www.egenera.com). The beauty is you can fix or allocate the resourses based on your

    needs like (2 cpu to SQL server, 1 CPu to app , 4 GB to APP etc) and it you need more resources they are

    easily scalable. Good for Hosting and need not buy n number of boxes.

    Cheers

    Ramesh

    Sydney

  • June 16, 2006 at 3:30 pm

    #644434

    Cool thanks guys.

Viewing 8 posts - 1 through 7 (of 7 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply