Help writing function to get decimal from string

  • I am building an SQL 2000 function that will take a varchar and output a decimal.

    The inputs and outputs should look like this:

    Goboland Steel Gobo - returns 0.0

    Procolor (39.0) - returns 39.0

    Rosco J1 (43.?) (DHA Metal Gobos) - returns 43.0

    Doughty 2, 3 & 4 (70.1) - returns 70.1

    Clay Paky Spares (no PDF) - returns 0.0

    DBX (A11.0) - returns 11.0

    Le Mark (Stocked) (no PDF) - returns 0.0

    Le Mark (non stocked) (no PDF) - returns 0.0

    This is what I have done so far:

    CREATE FUNCTION [dbo].[pbGroup] (@groupdesc varchar(50))

    RETURNS varchar(50)

    AS

    BEGIN

    -- Declare the return variable here

    DECLARE @value varchar(50)

    -- Add the T-SQL statements to compute the return value here

    SELECT @value = REPLACE(REPLACE(REPLACE(REPLACE(REPLACE(REPLACE(LEFT(SUBSTRING(@groupdesc, CHARINDEX('(',

    @groupdesc) + 1, 15), CHARINDEX(')', SUBSTRING(@groupdesc, CHARINDEX('(', @groupdesc) + 1,

    15))), ')', ''), 'no PDF', '0'), 'A', ''), '?', '0'), 'Stocked', '0'), 'non stocked', '0')

    -- Return the result of the function

    RETURN @value

    END

    The problem with this (apart from it being ugly and convoluted) is that it creates blanks for the entries where there are no brackets, and when I try to cast the output as decimal I get an error about converting varchar to decimal.

    When I view the results in enterprise manager these do not show as NULL, it just shows empty cells. I tried to do a replace nothing with 0 and it didn't work.

    The correct output is achieved for all others, apart from they are strings being returned, not decimal, and the who point is to be able to use this field to sort records.

    I am now stuck, and was wondering if anyone could suggest a better way to do this.

    Cheers,

    Steve

  • First, allow me to state that this isn't a good idea in the first place. Those numbers should be stripped out of that field and put in a new field... or at the very least, added to another field and left in the current one so that you don't have to try to pull them out every time you do anything. That said, here's another way of doing it using a Tally table. Not sure if Jeff is gonna slap me for this one, but we'll see. If you don't have a tally Table, read this article[/url] on how to create one, or simply do:

    [font="Courier New"]SELECT TOP 20000 IDENTITY(INT,1,1) N

    INTO Tally

    FROM

    MASTER..syscolumns s1, MASTER..syscolumns s2[/font]

    [font="Courier New"]CREATE FUNCTION [dbo].[pbGroup] (@OrigString VARCHAR(200))

    RETURNS VARCHAR(50)

    AS

    BEGIN

    DECLARE @NewString VARCHAR(200)

    -- SELECT dbo.pbGroup('Doughty 2, 3 & 4 (70.1)')

    -- SET @OrigString= 'Rosco J1 (43.?) (DHA Metal Gobos) '

    SET @OrigString= REPLACE(@OrigString,'.?','.0')

    SET @NewString = ''

    -- Strip all unneeded characters out of string

    SELECT @NewString = CASE WHEN SUBSTRING(@OrigString,N,1) IN ('0','1','2','3','4','5','6','7','8','9','.','(',')')

                           THEN @NewString + SUBSTRING(@OrigString,N,1)

                           ELSE @NewString

                           END

    FROM Tally

    WHERE N <= LEN(@OrigString)

    -- Get rid of extra parens

    SET @NewString = REPLACE(REPLACE(@NewString,'()',''),'( )','')

    -- Grab the Number if Any

    SET @NewString = SUBSTRING( @NewString,

                               CHARINDEX('(',@NewString,1)+1,

                               CHARINDEX(')',@NewString,1)-CHARINDEX('(',@NewString,1)-1)

    -- Set to 0.0 if no number available

    IF ISNULL(@NewString,'') LIKE '' SET @NewString = '0.0'

    -- Return Value

    RETURN @NewString

    END

    [/font]

    Seth Phelabaum


    Consistency is only a virtue if you're not a screwup. πŸ˜‰

    Links: How to Post Sample Data[/url] :: Running Totals[/url] :: Tally Table[/url] :: Cross Tabs/Pivots[/url] :: String Concatenation[/url]

  • Hi Seth,

    Thank for a possible solution.

    The data is in our sales system, its not something that can be changed. I am using the function in a view, this view is checked every 3 hours by a stored procedure, it is compared against a linked server (online) and then if there are any new rows it inserts them, and if any have changed then it inserts them, it also deletes any that aren't there any more.

    Once the data is online there are no functions being used against it as the data is all in a table rather than a view. The local view just pulls all the relevant information that is needed into one place and then uploaded.

    I do have a tally table so will give your method a go. My workaround was going to be making sure that all the descriptions had something in brackets, so there is always something left to change to 0.

    Cheers,

    Steve

  • Garadin, that's uncanny! I was working on this earlier and came up with the following:

    CREATE FUNCTION [dbo].[uftGetNumbersInBrackets]

    (

    @String VARCHAR(50)

    )

    RETURNS DECIMAL (10,2)

    AS

    BEGIN

    DECLARE @NewString VARCHAR(50)

    SET @NewString = ''

    SELECT @NewString = @NewString + SUBSTRING(@String, number,1)

    FROM Numbers

    WHERE number <= LEN(@String)

    AND SUBSTRING(@String, number, 1) IN ('(', ')', '0', '1', '2', '3', '4', '5', '6', '7', '8', '9', '.')

    AND number >= CHARINDEX('(',@String)

    SET @NewString = REPLACE(REPLACE(@NewString, ')', ''), '(', '')

    IF LEN(@NewString) > 0 RETURN CAST(@NewString AS DECIMAL (10,2))

    RETURN 0

    END

    Cheers

    ChrisM

    β€œWrite the query the simplest way. If through testing it becomes clear that the performance is inadequate, consider alternative query forms.” - Gail Shaw

    For fast, accurate and documented assistance in answering your questions, please read this article.
    Understanding and using APPLY, (I) and (II) Paul White
    Hidden RBAR: Triangular Joins / The "Numbers" or "Tally" Table: What it is and how it replaces a loop Jeff Moden

  • Hah. Great minds think alike! (Although, I'm sure dumb people think alike too, so let's hope we fit the first category).

    Seth Phelabaum


    Consistency is only a virtue if you're not a screwup. πŸ˜‰

    Links: How to Post Sample Data[/url] :: Running Totals[/url] :: Tally Table[/url] :: Cross Tabs/Pivots[/url] :: String Concatenation[/url]

  • I prefer Chris's solution, it returns the decimal just like I needed πŸ˜€

  • Dooza (11/14/2008)


    I prefer Chris's solution, it returns the decimal just like I needed πŸ˜€

    Seth's is almost identical identical apart from the datatype of the return value. He did what you did (RETURNS varchar(50)), not what you said ("an SQL 2000 function that will take a varchar and output a decimal")

    Cheers

    ChrisM

    β€œWrite the query the simplest way. If through testing it becomes clear that the performance is inadequate, consider alternative query forms.” - Gail Shaw

    For fast, accurate and documented assistance in answering your questions, please read this article.
    Understanding and using APPLY, (I) and (II) Paul White
    Hidden RBAR: Triangular Joins / The "Numbers" or "Tally" Table: What it is and how it replaces a loop Jeff Moden

  • Chris Morris (11/14/2008)


    Dooza (11/14/2008)


    I prefer Chris's solution, it returns the decimal just like I needed πŸ˜€

    Seth's is almost identical identical apart from the datatype of the return value. He did what you did (RETURNS varchar(50)), not what you said ("an SQL 2000 function that will take a varchar and output a decimal")

    Ooops, my bad, sorry!

  • Yeah, I have a bad habit of "skimming" what people say and just looking at their code. Also, remember that these things will always be limited on what they can handle to all the different combinations of crap you can think of ahead of time. For example, both our scripts get this one wrong, although in different ways:

    'Doughty 2, 3 & 4 (a2sdf) (70.1)'

    I output 2, Chris outputs 270.1

    Overall though, I agree, I think his solution is better as well, the extra SUBSTRING at the end of mine is a bit silly. TBH, if you don't need the extra SUBSTRING, then neither of us should even be including '(' or ')' in our list of characters, as we just strip them away again afterwards.

    Seth Phelabaum


    Consistency is only a virtue if you're not a screwup. πŸ˜‰

    Links: How to Post Sample Data[/url] :: Running Totals[/url] :: Tally Table[/url] :: Cross Tabs/Pivots[/url] :: String Concatenation[/url]

  • The key thing here for me is making sure the data is correct in the first place. Creating this function has brought to my attention all the variations and errors, so they are being fixed and procedures set so the data conforms to a set standard. This will limit the errors. For instance, the number should always be in the first set of brackets. This means Chris's solution is good for me.

    Thank you all for your help!

  • Dooza (11/14/2008)


    The key thing here for me is making sure the data is correct in the first place. Creating this function has brought to my attention all the variations and errors, so they are being fixed and procedures set so the data conforms to a set standard.

    Absolutely. Glad we could help.

    Seth Phelabaum


    Consistency is only a virtue if you're not a screwup. πŸ˜‰

    Links: How to Post Sample Data[/url] :: Running Totals[/url] :: Tally Table[/url] :: Cross Tabs/Pivots[/url] :: String Concatenation[/url]

  • So what happens if there are several pairs of brackets, some with numbers in?

    This picks the string between the first pair of brackets and grabs the numbers from it, but it could be changed to grab each bracketed string and return the first one containing numbers:

    DECLARE @String VARCHAR(50)

    SET @String = 'ABC (123.1 XYX) QTD (GFG) (55)'

    DECLARE @NewString VARCHAR(50)

    SET @NewString = ''

    SELECT @NewString = @NewString + SUBSTRING(BitInBrackets, n.number,1)

    FROM (

    SELECT TOP 1 SUBSTRING(@String, number+1, CHARINDEX(')', @String, number) - (number+1)) AS BitInBrackets

    FROM Numbers

    WHERE number = CHARINDEX('(', @String, number)

    ORDER BY number

    ) d, Numbers n

    WHERE n.number <= LEN(BitInBrackets)

    AND SUBSTRING(BitInBrackets, n.number, 1) IN ('0', '1', '2', '3', '4', '5', '6', '7', '8', '9', '.')

    SELECT @NewString

    Cheers

    ChrisM

    β€œWrite the query the simplest way. If through testing it becomes clear that the performance is inadequate, consider alternative query forms.” - Gail Shaw

    For fast, accurate and documented assistance in answering your questions, please read this article.
    Understanding and using APPLY, (I) and (II) Paul White
    Hidden RBAR: Triangular Joins / The "Numbers" or "Tally" Table: What it is and how it replaces a loop Jeff Moden

  • Garadin (11/14/2008)


    Not sure if Jeff is gonna slap me for this one, but we'll see.

    Heh... firing porkchop #1... [font="Arial Black"]SLAP![/font] πŸ˜› Ya gotta put a clustered index or, better yet, a clustered PK on N to maintain the order of processing, Seth. The Fill Factor on that also helps to "pack" it into as few pages as possible for maximum speed. Last, but not least, the GRANT lets everyone use it so no worries on privs in the future...

    --===== Create and populate the Tally table on the fly

    SELECT TOP 20000

    IDENTITY(INT,1,1) AS N

    INTO dbo.Tally

    FROM Master.dbo.SysColumns sc1,

    Master.dbo.SysColumns sc2

    --===== Add a Primary Key to maximize performance

    ALTER TABLE dbo.Tally

    ADD CONSTRAINT PK_Tally_N

    PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED (N) WITH FILLFACTOR = 100

    --===== Allow the general public to use it

    GRANT SELECT ON dbo.Tally TO PUBLIC

    --Jeff Moden


    RBAR is pronounced "ree-bar" and is a "Modenism" for Row-By-Agonizing-Row.
    First step towards the paradigm shift of writing Set Based code:
    ________Stop thinking about what you want to do to a ROW... think, instead, of what you want to do to a COLUMN.

    Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.


    Helpful Links:
    How to post code problems
    How to Post Performance Problems
    Create a Tally Function (fnTally)

  • Jeff Moden (11/14/2008)


    Garadin (11/14/2008)


    Not sure if Jeff is gonna slap me for this one, but we'll see.

    Heh... firing porkchop #1... [font="Arial Black"]SLAP![/font] πŸ˜› Ya gotta put a clustered index or, better yet, a clustered PK on N to maintain the order of processing, Seth. The Fill Factor on that also helps to "pack" it into as few pages as possible for maximum speed. Last, but not least, the GRANT lets everyone use it so no worries on privs in the future...

    --===== Create and populate the Tally table on the fly

    SELECT TOP 20000

    IDENTITY(INT,1,1) AS N

    INTO dbo.Tally

    FROM Master.dbo.SysColumns sc1,

    Master.dbo.SysColumns sc2

    --===== Add a Primary Key to maximize performance

    ALTER TABLE dbo.Tally

    ADD CONSTRAINT PK_Tally_N

    PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED (N) WITH FILLFACTOR = 100

    --===== Allow the general public to use it

    GRANT SELECT ON dbo.Tally TO PUBLIC

    Ack. Son of a... Yeah... on my real one I have it done correctly, I just wrote that script this off the top of my head, and apparently I shouldn't be doing that yet :blush:.

    Seth Phelabaum


    Consistency is only a virtue if you're not a screwup. πŸ˜‰

    Links: How to Post Sample Data[/url] :: Running Totals[/url] :: Tally Table[/url] :: Cross Tabs/Pivots[/url] :: String Concatenation[/url]

  • Heh... no problem. I hate typing the code off the top of my head so I keep the script handy at all times.

    --Jeff Moden


    RBAR is pronounced "ree-bar" and is a "Modenism" for Row-By-Agonizing-Row.
    First step towards the paradigm shift of writing Set Based code:
    ________Stop thinking about what you want to do to a ROW... think, instead, of what you want to do to a COLUMN.

    Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.


    Helpful Links:
    How to post code problems
    How to Post Performance Problems
    Create a Tally Function (fnTally)

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 54 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply